Class information for: |
Basic class information |
Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
---|---|---|---|
11091 | 1008 | 25.4 | 23% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 | ECONOMICS//EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH//PSYCHOL | 3876184 |
83 | 3 | MANAGEMENT//PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED//BUSINESS | 77967 |
3248 | 2 | JOURNAL OF COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATIONS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR//LABOR LAW JOURNAL//INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR | 1986 |
11091 | 1 | JOURNAL OF COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATIONS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR//ARBITRATION JOURNAL//INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR | 1008 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | JOURNAL OF COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATIONS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR | journal | 2759141 | 19% | 48% | 188 |
2 | ARBITRATION JOURNAL | journal | 873700 | 7% | 38% | 75 |
3 | INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR | WoSSC | 659853 | 68% | 3% | 686 |
4 | LABOR LAW JOURNAL | journal | 356367 | 9% | 13% | 89 |
5 | JOURNAL OF LABOR RESEARCH | journal | 143113 | 7% | 7% | 71 |
6 | INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW | journal | 127323 | 7% | 6% | 68 |
7 | FINAL OFFER ARBITRATION | authKW | 108181 | 0% | 71% | 5 |
8 | FINAL OFFER ARBITRATION FOA | authKW | 90874 | 0% | 100% | 3 |
9 | ARBITRATION | authKW | 90224 | 2% | 14% | 21 |
10 | INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS | journal | 78282 | 5% | 5% | 52 |
Web of Science journal categories |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Industrial Relations & Labor | 659853 | 68% | 3% | 686 |
2 | Public Administration | 48501 | 23% | 1% | 236 |
3 | Law | 13218 | 22% | 0% | 217 |
4 | Management | 1218 | 8% | 0% | 80 |
5 | Economics | 863 | 11% | 0% | 109 |
6 | Business | 568 | 5% | 0% | 47 |
7 | Psychology, Applied | 430 | 3% | 0% | 35 |
8 | Political Science | 221 | 3% | 0% | 32 |
9 | Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods | 86 | 1% | 0% | 13 |
10 | Communication | 84 | 1% | 0% | 13 |
Address terms |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | OR STUDIES IND RELAT | 53847 | 0% | 44% | 4 |
2 | EINMAN CONFLICT OLUT | 40387 | 0% | 67% | 2 |
3 | ACCOUNTING FINANCE BANKING GRP | 30291 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
4 | EMPOLYMENT STUDIES | 30291 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
5 | INT OR RELAT | 30291 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
6 | KARELIAN CENTER | 30291 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
7 | LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIV | 30291 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
8 | ORG WORK EMPLOYMENT IROWE | 30291 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
9 | SAM M WLATON BUSINESS | 30291 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
10 | ZABAIKALSKY STATE HUMANITARIAN | 30291 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
Journals |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | JOURNAL OF COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATIONS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR | 2759141 | 19% | 48% | 188 |
2 | ARBITRATION JOURNAL | 873700 | 7% | 38% | 75 |
3 | LABOR LAW JOURNAL | 356367 | 9% | 13% | 89 |
4 | JOURNAL OF LABOR RESEARCH | 143113 | 7% | 7% | 71 |
5 | INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW | 127323 | 7% | 6% | 68 |
6 | INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS | 78282 | 5% | 5% | 52 |
7 | RELATIONS INDUSTRIELLES-INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS | 65589 | 4% | 5% | 45 |
8 | PUBLIC PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 17225 | 2% | 2% | 25 |
9 | EMPLOYEE RELATIONS LAW JOURNAL | 15394 | 1% | 4% | 13 |
10 | DISPUTE RESOLUTION JOURNAL | 11848 | 0% | 13% | 3 |
Author Key Words |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | WALKER, B , HAMILTON, RT , (2011) EMPLOYEE-EMPLOYER GRIEVANCES: A REVIEW.INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS. VOL. 13. ISSUE 1. P. 40 -58 | 51 | 70% | 2 |
2 | BEMMELS, B , FOLEY, JR , (1996) GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE RESEARCH: A REVIEW AND THEORETICAL RECOMMENDATIONS.JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT. VOL. 22. ISSUE 3. P. 359-384 | 37 | 77% | 28 |
3 | CHARLWOOD, A , POLLERT, A , (2014) INFORMAL EMPLOYMENT DISPUTE RESOLUTION AMONG LOW-WAGE NON-UNION WORKERS: DOES MANAGERIALLY INITIATED WORKPLACE VOICE ENHANCE EQUITY AND EFFICIENCY?.BRITISH JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS. VOL. 52. ISSUE 2. P. 359-386 | 16 | 100% | 2 |
4 | FREEMAN, RB , (1986) UNIONISM COMES TO THE PUBLIC-SECTOR.JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE. VOL. 24. ISSUE 1. P. 41-86 | 47 | 68% | 153 |
5 | BINGHAM, LB , MESCH, DJ , (2000) DECISION MAKING IN EMPLOYMENT AND LABOR ARBITRATION.INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS. VOL. 39. ISSUE 4. P. 671-694 | 32 | 63% | 18 |
6 | BUDD, JW , COLVIN, AJS , (2008) IMPROVED METRICS FOR WORKPLACE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES: EFFICIENCY, EQUITY, AND VOICE.INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS. VOL. 47. ISSUE 3. P. 460-479 | 19 | 83% | 12 |
7 | OLSZEWSKI, W , (2011) A WELFARE ANALYSIS OF ARBITRATION.AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS. VOL. 3. ISSUE 1. P. 174 -213 | 17 | 85% | 1 |
8 | CHAPPE, N , GABUTHY, Y , (2013) THE INFLUENCE OF LAWYERS AND FEE ARRANGEMENTS ON ARBITRATION.JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT. VOL. 169. ISSUE 4. P. 720-738 | 21 | 64% | 0 |
9 | ARMSTRONG, MJ , (2004) A COMPARISON OF ARBITRATION PROCEDURES FOR RISK-AVERSE DISPUTANTS.DECISION SCIENCES. VOL. 35. ISSUE 4. P. 639-664 | 17 | 94% | 3 |
10 | LAVAN, H , (1990) ARBITRATION IN THE PUBLIC-SECTOR - A CURRENT PERSPECTIVE.JOURNAL OF COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATIONS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR. VOL. 19. ISSUE 2. P. 153-163 | 25 | 100% | 6 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |