Class information for: |
Basic class information |
Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
---|---|---|---|
32411 | 139 | 37.7 | 13% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 | ECONOMICS//EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH//PSYCHOL | 3876184 |
106 | 3 | LAW//FORDHAM LAW REVIEW//BUSINESS LAWYER | 71924 |
398 | 2 | LAW//ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW//JUDICATURE | 16759 |
32411 | 1 | FINANCIAL REGULATION RESET//OPTIMAL FINANCIAL REGULATION//URBAN LAWYER | 139 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | FINANCIAL REGULATION RESET | authKW | 219680 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
2 | OPTIMAL FINANCIAL REGULATION | authKW | 219680 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
3 | URBAN LAWYER | journal | 191178 | 18% | 3% | 25 |
4 | LAW | WoSSC | 22964 | 76% | 0% | 105 |
5 | ECOLOGY LAW QUARTERLY | journal | 19323 | 6% | 1% | 8 |
6 | FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE | authKW | 13728 | 1% | 6% | 1 |
7 | FINANCIAL DEREGULATION | authKW | 10982 | 1% | 5% | 1 |
8 | LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW | journal | 7928 | 4% | 1% | 6 |
9 | BUFFALO LAW REVIEW | journal | 5358 | 3% | 1% | 4 |
10 | PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW | journal | 4486 | 5% | 0% | 7 |
Web of Science journal categories |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Law | 22964 | 76% | 0% | 105 |
2 | Urban Studies | 4456 | 19% | 0% | 27 |
3 | Public Administration | 1809 | 12% | 0% | 17 |
4 | Criminology & Penology | 232 | 4% | 0% | 6 |
5 | Environmental Studies | 209 | 7% | 0% | 10 |
6 | Industrial Relations & Labor | 155 | 3% | 0% | 4 |
7 | Sociology | 118 | 6% | 0% | 8 |
8 | Social Work | 40 | 2% | 0% | 3 |
9 | Education & Educational Research | 38 | 4% | 0% | 6 |
10 | Social Issues | 24 | 1% | 0% | 2 |
Address terms |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ANTITRUST | 2412 | 1% | 1% | 1 |
2 | DANIELS BUSINESS | 1770 | 1% | 1% | 1 |
3 | HUMAN RIGHTS | 1125 | 1% | 1% | 1 |
4 | COLUMBUS LAW | 925 | 1% | 0% | 1 |
5 | LAW | 109 | 3% | 0% | 4 |
Journals |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | URBAN LAWYER | 191178 | 18% | 3% | 25 |
2 | ECOLOGY LAW QUARTERLY | 19323 | 6% | 1% | 8 |
3 | LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW | 7928 | 4% | 1% | 6 |
4 | BUFFALO LAW REVIEW | 5358 | 3% | 1% | 4 |
5 | PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW | 4486 | 5% | 0% | 7 |
6 | JUSTICE SYSTEM JOURNAL | 3537 | 2% | 1% | 3 |
7 | CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | 2129 | 2% | 0% | 3 |
8 | COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF LAW AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS | 2083 | 1% | 0% | 2 |
9 | ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL | 1962 | 1% | 0% | 2 |
10 | NETHERLANDS QUARTERLY OF HUMAN RIGHTS | 1942 | 1% | 1% | 1 |
Author Key Words |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | FRANKEL, LM , (2008) RETHINKING THE TUNNEY ACT: A MODEL FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ANTITRUST CONSENT DECREES.ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 75. ISSUE 2. P. 549-622 | 4 | 100% | 2 |
2 | FREILICH, RH , RICHARDSON, DG , (1994) RETURNING TO A GENERAL-THEORY OF FEDERALISM - FRAMING A NEW 10TH-AMENDMENT UNITED-STATES-SUPREME-COURT CASE.URBAN LAWYER. VOL. 26. ISSUE 2. P. 215-234 | 6 | 67% | 4 |
3 | NEVIN, HL , (2000) THE WHEELING BRIDGE EXCEPTION: REOPENING EXECUTORY JUDGMENTS OF ARTICLE III COURTS.UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW. VOL. 67. ISSUE 2. P. 547-571 | 4 | 80% | 0 |
4 | MARTIN, CR , (1992) PREEMPTION IN THE AGE OF LOCAL REGULATORY INNOVATION - FITTING THE FORMULA TO A DIFFERENT KIND OF CONFLICT.TEXAS LAW REVIEW. VOL. 70. ISSUE 7. P. 1831-1850 | 5 | 83% | 2 |
5 | LOW, S , (2009) IMPROVING THE EDUCATION OF CALIFORNIA'S JUVENILE OFFENDERS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO CONSENT DECREES.UCLA LAW REVIEW. VOL. 57. ISSUE 1. P. 275-312 | 4 | 57% | 0 |
6 | KONCZAL, DS , (1996) RUING RUFO: RAMIFICATIONS OF A LENIENT STANDARD TOR MODIFYING ANTITRUST CONSENT DECREES AND AN ALTERNATIVE.GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW. VOL. 65. ISSUE 1. P. 130-168 | 4 | 80% | 1 |
7 | FLITER, J , (1996) ANOTHER LOOK AT THE JUDICIAL POWER OF THE PURSE: COURTS, CORRECTIONS, AND STATE BUDGETS IN THE 1980S.LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW. VOL. 30. ISSUE 2. P. 399-416 | 3 | 100% | 4 |
8 | SCHACHTER, HL , (1988) PERFORMANCE AND TEACHER LAY-OFFS.INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF EDUCATION. VOL. 34. ISSUE 1. P. 109-115 | 5 | 83% | 0 |
9 | BITTLE, EH , HELMS, LB , NORTON, ME , (1995) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC EDUCATION - RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN PUBLIC EDUCATION LAW.URBAN LAWYER. VOL. 27. ISSUE 4. P. 897-941 | 3 | 100% | 0 |
10 | DETLEFSEN, RR , (1995) GOVERNMENT CONSENT DECREES AND THE PARADOX OF ''CONSENT'': A CRITICAL CASE STUDY.JUSTICE SYSTEM JOURNAL. VOL. 18. ISSUE 1. P. 13-27 | 3 | 100% | 0 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |