Class information for: |
Basic class information |
| Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22308 | 386 | 61.3 | 16% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
| Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | ECONOMICS//EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH//PSYCHOL | 3876184 |
| 106 | 3 | LAW//FORDHAM LAW REVIEW//BUSINESS LAWYER | 71924 |
| 398 | 2 | LAW//ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW//JUDICATURE | 16759 |
| 22308 | 1 | LAW//ANIMAL WELFARE ISSUE//EPAS AUTHORITY TO REGULATE GREENHOUSE GASES | 386 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
| rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LAW | WoSSC | 96835 | 93% | 0% | 359 |
| 2 | ANIMAL WELFARE ISSUE | authKW | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 3 | EPAS AUTHORITY TO REGULATE GREENHOUSE GASES | authKW | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 4 | HIGHLY RADIOACTIVE WASTE | authKW | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 5 | HONORABLE DENNY CHIN | address | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 6 | INFORMATION DISCLOSURE POLICIES | authKW | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 7 | INJURY CAUSED BY CLIMATE CHANGE | authKW | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 8 | IWMI LAOS OFF | address | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 9 | LAW OF QUOTAS | authKW | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 10 | LITIGAT REGULATORY | address | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
Web of Science journal categories |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Law | 96835 | 93% | 0% | 359 |
| 2 | Environmental Studies | 1175 | 10% | 0% | 39 |
| 3 | International Relations | 40 | 2% | 0% | 6 |
| 4 | Medical Ethics | 24 | 1% | 0% | 2 |
| 5 | Ethics | 16 | 1% | 0% | 3 |
| 6 | Industrial Relations & Labor | 11 | 1% | 0% | 2 |
| 7 | Political Science | 9 | 1% | 0% | 5 |
| 8 | Urban Studies | 5 | 1% | 0% | 2 |
| 9 | Religion | 4 | 1% | 0% | 2 |
| 10 | Social Sciences, Biomedical | 3 | 1% | 0% | 2 |
Address terms |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HONORABLE DENNY CHIN | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 2 | IWMI LAOS OFF | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 3 | LITIGAT REGULATORY | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 4 | MAXWELL CITIZENSHIP PUBL ADM | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 5 | PROGRAM LAW MARKET ECON | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 6 | SUBCOMM ELECT BANKING INTERNET DELIVERY | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 7 | SUBCOMM ELECT BANKING INTERNET POLICY | 79106 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 8 | LAW CLASS | 26367 | 0% | 33% | 1 |
| 9 | CONSTITUT LAW | 21088 | 1% | 7% | 4 |
| 10 | LAW | 21052 | 23% | 0% | 90 |
Journals |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ECOLOGY LAW QUARTERLY | 57517 | 6% | 3% | 23 |
| 2 | HARVARD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW | 34167 | 3% | 3% | 13 |
| 3 | GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW | 17262 | 4% | 1% | 16 |
| 4 | STANFORD LAW REVIEW | 12980 | 4% | 1% | 14 |
| 5 | UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW | 10961 | 4% | 1% | 14 |
| 6 | NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW | 10184 | 3% | 1% | 12 |
| 7 | MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW | 9437 | 3% | 1% | 12 |
| 8 | CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW | 7722 | 3% | 1% | 11 |
| 9 | COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW | 7297 | 3% | 1% | 12 |
| 10 | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW | 6690 | 2% | 1% | 8 |
Author Key Words |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
| Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RE, RM , (2014) RELATIVE STANDING.GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 102. ISSUE 4. P. 1191-1250 | 34 | 74% | 5 |
| 2 | FALLON, RH , (2015) THE FRAGMENTATION OF STANDING.TEXAS LAW REVIEW. VOL. 93. ISSUE 5. P. 1061 -1117 | 23 | 68% | 8 |
| 3 | ELLIOTT, H , (2012) STANDING LESSONS: WHAT WE CAN LEARN WHEN CONSERVATIVE PLAINTIFFS LOSE UNDER ARTICLE III STANDING DOCTRINE.INDIANA LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 87. ISSUE 2. P. 551-598 | 24 | 67% | 6 |
| 4 | TERENZI, R , (2009) WHEN COWS FLY: EXPANDING COGNIZABLE INJURY-IN-FACT AND INTEREST GROUP LITIGATION.FORDHAM LAW REVIEW. VOL. 78. ISSUE 3. P. 1559-1605 | 15 | 94% | 1 |
| 5 | ELLIOTT, H , (2008) THE FUNCTIONS OF STANDING.STANFORD LAW REVIEW. VOL. 61. ISSUE 3. P. 459-517 | 18 | 72% | 45 |
| 6 | HO, DE , ROSS, EL , (2010) DID LIBERAL JUSTICES INVENT THE STANDING DOCTRINE? AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE EVOLUTION OF STANDING, 1921-2006.STANFORD LAW REVIEW. VOL. 62. ISSUE 3. P. 591-667 | 28 | 42% | 18 |
| 7 | HESSICK, FA , (2008) STANDING, INJURY IN FACT, AND PRIVATE RIGHTS.CORNELL LAW REVIEW. VOL. 93. ISSUE 2. P. 275-327 | 18 | 67% | 26 |
| 8 | NASH, JR , (2013) STANDING'S EXPECTED VALUE.MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW. VOL. 111. ISSUE 7. P. 1283-1335 | 21 | 49% | 10 |
| 9 | HALL, MI , (2011) ASYMMETRICAL JURISDICTION.UCLA LAW REVIEW. VOL. 58. ISSUE 5. P. 1257 -1302 | 14 | 74% | 6 |
| 10 | LEE, ET , ELLIS, JM , (2012) THE STANDING DOCTRINE'S DIRTY LITTLE SECRET.NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 107. ISSUE 1. P. 169 -236 | 15 | 65% | 9 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |