Class information for: |
Basic class information |
Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
---|---|---|---|
398 | 16759 | 67.1 | 19% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
Terms with highest relevance score |
rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | LAW | WoSSC | 3431925 | 84% | 13% | 14088 |
2 | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW | journal | 464220 | 3% | 58% | 439 |
3 | JUDICATURE | journal | 389090 | 3% | 50% | 425 |
4 | GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW | journal | 239535 | 2% | 34% | 393 |
5 | JUSTICE SYSTEM JOURNAL | journal | 208505 | 2% | 45% | 253 |
6 | TEXAS LAW REVIEW | journal | 203484 | 2% | 29% | 387 |
7 | HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY | journal | 193813 | 2% | 33% | 328 |
8 | NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW | journal | 188057 | 2% | 30% | 340 |
9 | DUKE LAW JOURNAL | journal | 185615 | 2% | 30% | 339 |
10 | COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW | journal | 182838 | 2% | 25% | 396 |
Web of Science journal categories |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Law | 3431925 | 84% | 13% | 14088 |
2 | Political Science | 29630 | 8% | 1% | 1399 |
3 | International Relations | 6785 | 3% | 1% | 483 |
4 | Environmental Studies | 1274 | 2% | 0% | 312 |
5 | Public Administration | 1160 | 1% | 0% | 167 |
6 | Economics | 907 | 4% | 0% | 594 |
7 | Sociology | 709 | 2% | 0% | 260 |
8 | Social Issues | 493 | 1% | 0% | 109 |
9 | Industrial Relations & Labor | 490 | 1% | 0% | 88 |
10 | Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary | 463 | 1% | 0% | 189 |
Address terms |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | LAW | 927448 | 23% | 13% | 3936 |
2 | WILLIAM S BOYD LAW | 21921 | 0% | 43% | 28 |
3 | POLIT SCI | 20829 | 3% | 2% | 525 |
4 | WASHINGTON LAW | 19534 | 0% | 22% | 50 |
5 | CECIL D BRANSTETTER LITIGAT DISPUTE OLUT PRO | 16381 | 0% | 100% | 9 |
6 | CONSTITUT LAW | 13350 | 0% | 35% | 21 |
7 | COLUMBUS LAW | 10451 | 0% | 16% | 37 |
8 | HASTINGS LAW | 9729 | 0% | 16% | 34 |
9 | COMPARAT INT POLIT | 8313 | 0% | 57% | 8 |
10 | PROGRAM CITIZENSHIP DEMOCRAT VALUES | 8102 | 0% | 64% | 7 |
Journals |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW | 464220 | 3% | 58% | 439 |
2 | JUDICATURE | 389090 | 3% | 50% | 425 |
3 | GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW | 239535 | 2% | 34% | 393 |
4 | JUSTICE SYSTEM JOURNAL | 208505 | 2% | 45% | 253 |
5 | TEXAS LAW REVIEW | 203484 | 2% | 29% | 387 |
6 | HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY | 193813 | 2% | 33% | 328 |
7 | NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW | 188057 | 2% | 30% | 340 |
8 | DUKE LAW JOURNAL | 185615 | 2% | 30% | 339 |
9 | COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW | 182838 | 2% | 25% | 396 |
10 | FORDHAM LAW REVIEW | 177382 | 3% | 21% | 468 |
Author Key Words |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
LCSH search | Wikipedia search |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | SUPREME COURT | 96468 | 1% | 60% | 88 | Search SUPREME+COURT | Search SUPREME+COURT |
2 | JUDICIAL POLITICS | 66539 | 0% | 76% | 48 | Search JUDICIAL+POLITICS | Search JUDICIAL+POLITICS |
3 | JUDICIAL BEHAVIOR | 58963 | 0% | 90% | 36 | Search JUDICIAL+BEHAVIOR | Search JUDICIAL+BEHAVIOR |
4 | JUDICIAL ELECTIONS | 32850 | 0% | 95% | 19 | Search JUDICIAL+ELECTIONS | Search JUDICIAL+ELECTIONS |
5 | US SUPREME COURT | 31583 | 0% | 69% | 25 | Search US+SUPREME+COURT | Search US+SUPREME+COURT |
6 | JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING | 29114 | 0% | 49% | 33 | Search JUDICIAL+DECISION+MAKING | Search JUDICIAL+DECISION+MAKING |
7 | JUDICIAL SELECTION | 27680 | 0% | 89% | 17 | Search JUDICIAL+SELECTION | Search JUDICIAL+SELECTION |
8 | AMICUS CURIAE | 25593 | 0% | 94% | 15 | Search AMICUS+CURIAE | Search AMICUS+CURIAE |
9 | STATE SUPREME COURTS | 23780 | 0% | 93% | 14 | Search STATE+SUPREME+COURTS | Search STATE+SUPREME+COURTS |
10 | COURTS OF APPEALS | 20021 | 0% | 100% | 11 | Search COURTS+OF+APPEALS | Search COURTS+OF+APPEALS |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MOLOT, JT , (2003) AN OLD JUDICIAL ROLE FOR A NEW LITIGATION ERA.YALE LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 113. ISSUE 1. P. 27-+ | 149 | 89% | 43 |
2 | FRIEDMAN, B , (2005) THE POLITICS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW.TEXAS LAW REVIEW. VOL. 84. ISSUE 2. P. 257-337 | 131 | 91% | 62 |
3 | MILLER, AR , (2013) SIMPLIFIED PLEADING, MEANINGFUL DAYS IN COURT, AND TRIALS ON THE MERITS: REFLECTIONS ON THE DEFORMATION OF FEDERAL PROCEDURE.NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 88. ISSUE 1. P. 286 -372 | 86 | 93% | 28 |
4 | BAUDE, W , (2015) IS ORIGINALISM OUR LAW?.COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW. VOL. 115. ISSUE 8. P. 2349 -2408 | 83 | 90% | 9 |
5 | MANNING, JF , (2014) FOREWORD: THE MEANS OF CONSTITUTIONAL POWER.HARVARD LAW REVIEW. VOL. 128. ISSUE 1. P. - | 94 | 94% | 0 |
6 | MOLOT, JT , (2002) REEXAMINING MARBURY IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE: A STRUCTURAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DEFENSE OF JUDICIAL POWER OVER STATUTORY INTERPRETATION.NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 96. ISSUE 4. P. 1239-1337 | 122 | 90% | 43 |
7 | GALLE, B , SEIDENFELD, M , (2008) ADMINISTRATIVE LAW'S FEDERALISM: PREEMPTION, DELEGATION, AND AGENCIES AT THE EDGE OF FEDERAL POWER.DUKE LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 57. ISSUE 7. P. 1933-2022 | 114 | 78% | 44 |
8 | MOLOT, JT , (2004) PRINCIPLED MINIMALISM: RESTRIKING THE BALANCE BETWEEN JUDICIAL MINIMALISM AND NEUTRAL PRINCIPLES.VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW. VOL. 90. ISSUE 7. P. 1753-1847 | 118 | 91% | 11 |
9 | BRUHL, AAP , (2012) HIERARCHY AND HETEROGENEITY: HOW TO READ A STATUTE IN A LOWER COURT.CORNELL LAW REVIEW. VOL. 97. ISSUE 3. P. 433 -499 | 90 | 93% | 11 |
10 | GLUCK, AR , BRESSMAN, LS , (2013) STATUTORY INTERPRETATION FROM THE INSIDE-AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF CONGRESSIONAL DRAFTING, DELEGATION, AND THE CANONS: PART I.STANFORD LAW REVIEW. VOL. 65. ISSUE 5. P. 901 -1025 | 67 | 93% | 63 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 2 |