Monthly meetings, with every event having a presentation phase, a technical discussion phase, and a scientific writing phase. Before each event, a homework must be submitted to the examiner with an analysis of the journals under discussion.
FEK3151 Topics in Electromagnetic Interactions with Microsystems I 3.0 credits
The course is arranged as a journal club seminar series with 2 (academic) hours long units once a month. Every unit consists of the presentation and analysis of at least one selected journal paper of relevance to the participants. Every unit has a participant in a dedicated presenter role, and another participant in the moderator role. There is a rotation scheme for these roles between the different events. The journal papers under discussion will need to be approved by the course responsible at least a week before the meeting. At the event, the presenter is presenting the paper, including its background, findings and conclusions. Then there are two discussion rounds in which all participants gets their turns. In the first discussion round, the technical content of the journal is analyzed and discussed, and this round is held like a question&answering session interacting with the presenter. In the second round, the participants discuss the non-technical aspects of the paper: structure, completeness, language, quality of figures, appropriateness of abstracts, substantiation of results, appropriateness of conclusions.
As a homework, each participating student must submit a paper analysis before the event.
Information per course offering
Course offerings are missing for current or upcoming semesters.
Course syllabus as PDF
Please note: all information from the Course syllabus is available on this page in an accessible format.
Course syllabus FEK3151 (Spring 2024–)Information for research students about course offerings
The course is given continuously. Location is Malvinasväg 10, 5th floor, MST seminar room.
Content and learning outcomes
Course disposition
Course contents
Monthly meetings, with every event having a presentation phase, a technical discussion phase, and a scientific writing phase. Before each event, a homework must be submitted to the examiner with an analysis of the journals under discussion.
Intended learning outcomes
In the course of these meetings, the student will be able:
- To critically analyze a the technical content of a scientific publication in the field.
- To critically analyze the quality of paper writing of a scientific publication.
- To present a scientific paper, in his/her field, but not of his/her own work, to a critical audience.
- To write his/her own publications with improved quality.
Literature and preparations
Specific prerequisites
MSc degree in electrical engineering, technical physics, or equivalent. Furthermore, the student must be enrolled in a PhD student programme with a project in the interdisciplinary field of electromagnetic waves and microsystems.
Recommended prerequisites
MSc degree in electrical engineering, technical physics, or equivalent. Furthermore, the student must be enrolled in a PhD student programme with a project in the interdisciplinary field of electromagnetic waves and microsystems.
Equipment
Literature
Examination and completion
If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.
Grading scale
Examination
- EXA1 - Examination, 3.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.
The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.
Other requirements for final grade
To get the full credits after a full academic year period, the student must:
- be present at 10 meetings (corresponding to a full academic year)
- have been at least once in the presenter, and at least once in the moderator’s role
- have submitted all homework assignments in time
Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination
Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination
Examiner
Ethical approach
- All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
- In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
- In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.