Class information for: |
Basic class information |
| Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7867 | 1319 | 63.7 | 19% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
| Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | ECONOMICS//EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH//PSYCHOL | 3876184 |
| 106 | 3 | LAW//FORDHAM LAW REVIEW//BUSINESS LAWYER | 71924 |
| 1627 | 2 | LAW//URBAN LAWYER//JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES | 7008 |
| 7867 | 1 | LAW//CONTRACT ECON ORG//JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES | 1319 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
| rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LAW | WoSSC | 328872 | 93% | 1% | 1223 |
| 2 | CONTRACT ECON ORG | address | 208339 | 1% | 100% | 9 |
| 3 | JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES | journal | 74728 | 4% | 6% | 53 |
| 4 | LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW | journal | 69390 | 4% | 6% | 47 |
| 5 | UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE LAW JOURNAL | journal | 66954 | 1% | 32% | 9 |
| 6 | CONTRACT LAW | authKW | 65123 | 1% | 26% | 11 |
| 7 | SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE | authKW | 61727 | 0% | 67% | 4 |
| 8 | MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW | journal | 58055 | 4% | 5% | 55 |
| 9 | IMPLIED TERMS | authKW | 52083 | 0% | 75% | 3 |
| 10 | BATTLE OF FORMS | authKW | 46297 | 0% | 100% | 2 |
Web of Science journal categories |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Law | 328872 | 93% | 1% | 1223 |
| 2 | International Relations | 694 | 3% | 0% | 43 |
| 3 | Economics | 491 | 8% | 0% | 99 |
| 4 | Business | 228 | 3% | 0% | 36 |
| 5 | Ethics | 108 | 1% | 0% | 14 |
| 6 | Business, Finance | 79 | 1% | 0% | 18 |
| 7 | AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION REPORTS | 20 | 0% | 0% | 1 |
| 8 | Philosophy | 14 | 1% | 0% | 10 |
| 9 | Public Administration | 8 | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 10 | History of Social Sciences | 7 | 0% | 0% | 3 |
Address terms |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CONTRACT ECON ORG | 208339 | 1% | 100% | 9 |
| 2 | LAW | 95422 | 27% | 1% | 354 |
| 3 | AUSTRALIAN CONSTRUCT LAW NEWSLETTER | 23149 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 4 | CSECL | 23149 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 5 | EMERGING OLARS PROGRAM | 23149 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 6 | LAW INTER AMER FREE TRADE | 23149 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 7 | LEHRSTUHL BURGERLICHES RECHT WIRT AFTSRECHT O | 23149 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 8 | NEGOTIAT CONFLICT OLUT PROGRAM | 23149 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 9 | TEORIA DERECHO | 23149 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 10 | PROGRAM LAW ENVIRONM | 23147 | 0% | 50% | 2 |
Journals |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES | 74728 | 4% | 6% | 53 |
| 2 | LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW | 69390 | 4% | 6% | 47 |
| 3 | UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE LAW JOURNAL | 66954 | 1% | 32% | 9 |
| 4 | MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW | 58055 | 4% | 5% | 55 |
| 5 | WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW | 34674 | 3% | 4% | 38 |
| 6 | TORT & INSURANCE LAW JOURNAL | 32934 | 1% | 13% | 11 |
| 7 | COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW | 30039 | 3% | 3% | 45 |
| 8 | AMERICAN BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL | 26402 | 2% | 5% | 25 |
| 9 | UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW | 26172 | 3% | 3% | 40 |
| 10 | HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL | 24336 | 3% | 3% | 35 |
Author Key Words |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
LCSH search | Wikipedia search |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CONTRACT LAW | 65123 | 1% | 26% | 11 | Search CONTRACT+LAW | Search CONTRACT+LAW |
| 2 | SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE | 61727 | 0% | 67% | 4 | Search SPECIFIC+PERFORMANCE | Search SPECIFIC+PERFORMANCE |
| 3 | IMPLIED TERMS | 52083 | 0% | 75% | 3 | Search IMPLIED+TERMS | Search IMPLIED+TERMS |
| 4 | BATTLE OF FORMS | 46297 | 0% | 100% | 2 | Search BATTLE+OF+FORMS | Search BATTLE+OF+FORMS |
| 5 | REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT | 46297 | 0% | 100% | 2 | Search REMEDIES+FOR+BREACH+OF+CONTRACT | Search REMEDIES+FOR+BREACH+OF+CONTRACT |
| 6 | BREACH OF CONTRACT | 44511 | 0% | 38% | 5 | Search BREACH+OF+CONTRACT | Search BREACH+OF+CONTRACT |
| 7 | ACCESS AND BENEFITS SHARING | 23149 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search ACCESS+AND+BENEFITS+SHARING | Search ACCESS+AND+BENEFITS+SHARING |
| 8 | ADAPTATION OF CONTRACTS | 23149 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search ADAPTATION+OF+CONTRACTS | Search ADAPTATION+OF+CONTRACTS |
| 9 | AGREED DAMAGES | 23149 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search AGREED+DAMAGES | Search AGREED+DAMAGES |
| 10 | AGREEMENT TO AGREE | 23149 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search AGREEMENT+TO+AGREE | Search AGREEMENT+TO+AGREE |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
| Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TRAKMAN, L , (2010) PLURALISM IN CONTRACT LAW.BUFFALO LAW REVIEW. VOL. 58. ISSUE 5. P. 1031 -1093 | 69 | 54% | 3 |
| 2 | ZAMIR, E , (2007) THE MISSING INTEREST: RESTORATION OF THE CONTRACTUAL EQUIVALENCE.VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW. VOL. 93. ISSUE 1. P. 59-138 | 46 | 77% | 3 |
| 3 | POSNER, EA , (2003) ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CONTRACT LAW AFTER THREE DECADES: SUCCESS OR FAILURE?.YALE LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 112. ISSUE 4. P. 829-880 | 45 | 73% | 53 |
| 4 | CRASWELL, R , (2000) AGAINST FULLER AND PERDUE.UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW. VOL. 67. ISSUE 1. P. 99 -161 | 50 | 74% | 25 |
| 5 | HOFFMAN, DA , WILKINSON-RYAN, T , (2013) THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CONTRACT PRECAUTIONS.UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW. VOL. 80. ISSUE 1. P. 395 -445 | 41 | 59% | 6 |
| 6 | ZAMIR, E , (2014) CONTRACT LAW AND THEORY: THREE VIEWS OF THE CATHEDRAL.UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW. VOL. 81. ISSUE 4. P. 2077 -2123 | 36 | 67% | 2 |
| 7 | SOLAN, LM , (2007) CONTRACT AS AGREEMENT.NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW. VOL. 83. ISSUE 1. P. 353-408 | 34 | 83% | 4 |
| 8 | KATZ, AW , (2014) CONTRACT THEORY-WHO NEEDS IT?.UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW. VOL. 81. ISSUE 4. P. 2043 -2076 | 29 | 78% | 1 |
| 9 | SCHWARTZ, A , SCOTT, RE , (2016) THE COMMON LAW OF CONTRACT AND THE DEFAULT RULE PROJECT.VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW. VOL. 102. ISSUE 6. P. 1523 -1588 | 29 | 67% | 1 |
| 10 | BAGCHI, A , (2013) PARALLEL CONTRACT.UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW. VOL. 75. ISSUE 2. P. 139 -187 | 31 | 70% | 0 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |