Class information for: |
Basic class information |
| Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4724 | 1737 | 64.0 | 14% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
| Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | ECONOMICS//EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH//PSYCHOL | 3876184 |
| 106 | 3 | LAW//FORDHAM LAW REVIEW//BUSINESS LAWYER | 71924 |
| 3010 | 2 | LAW//HARVARD CIVIL RIGHTS-CIVIL LIBERTIES LAW REVIEW//NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | 2534 |
| 4724 | 1 | LAW//HARVARD CIVIL RIGHTS-CIVIL LIBERTIES LAW REVIEW//UCLA LAW REVIEW | 1737 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
| rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LAW | WoSSC | 385580 | 88% | 1% | 1520 |
| 2 | HARVARD CIVIL RIGHTS-CIVIL LIBERTIES LAW REVIEW | journal | 56813 | 2% | 8% | 39 |
| 3 | UCLA LAW REVIEW | journal | 49084 | 3% | 5% | 55 |
| 4 | NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | journal | 45753 | 3% | 5% | 56 |
| 5 | HARVARD LAW REVIEW | journal | 36294 | 3% | 4% | 52 |
| 6 | COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW | journal | 31630 | 3% | 3% | 53 |
| 7 | MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW | journal | 30726 | 3% | 4% | 47 |
| 8 | SUPREME COURT REVIEW | journal | 28301 | 1% | 9% | 18 |
| 9 | VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW | journal | 27657 | 3% | 4% | 45 |
| 10 | DENVER UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | journal | 26884 | 2% | 5% | 32 |
Web of Science journal categories |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Law | 385580 | 88% | 1% | 1520 |
| 2 | Ethics | 642 | 2% | 0% | 37 |
| 3 | Social Issues | 481 | 2% | 0% | 31 |
| 4 | Communication | 463 | 2% | 0% | 38 |
| 5 | Philosophy | 169 | 2% | 0% | 31 |
| 6 | Business | 86 | 2% | 0% | 28 |
| 7 | Urban Studies | 71 | 1% | 0% | 14 |
| 8 | Political Science | 69 | 2% | 0% | 27 |
| 9 | Education & Educational Research | 57 | 2% | 0% | 32 |
| 10 | Cultural Studies | 48 | 0% | 0% | 7 |
Address terms |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LAW | 77298 | 21% | 1% | 366 |
| 2 | COLUMBUS LAW | 21403 | 1% | 7% | 17 |
| 3 | C ITAL PUBL LAW POLICY | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 4 | CLAUDE W PETIT LAW | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 5 | CMCL MEDIA COMMUN LAW | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 6 | ELECT ENGN PUBL POLICY MANAGEMENT | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 7 | FUTURE MEDIA PROGRAMME | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 8 | IOWA LAW FIRM | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 9 | LAW LIB SERV | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| 10 | LAW ORG | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
Journals |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HARVARD CIVIL RIGHTS-CIVIL LIBERTIES LAW REVIEW | 56813 | 2% | 8% | 39 |
| 2 | UCLA LAW REVIEW | 49084 | 3% | 5% | 55 |
| 3 | NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | 45753 | 3% | 5% | 56 |
| 4 | HARVARD LAW REVIEW | 36294 | 3% | 4% | 52 |
| 5 | COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW | 31630 | 3% | 3% | 53 |
| 6 | MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW | 30726 | 3% | 4% | 47 |
| 7 | SUPREME COURT REVIEW | 28301 | 1% | 9% | 18 |
| 8 | VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW | 27657 | 3% | 4% | 45 |
| 9 | DENVER UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | 26884 | 2% | 5% | 32 |
| 10 | SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW | 26623 | 2% | 4% | 43 |
Author Key Words |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
LCSH search | Wikipedia search |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FREEDOM OF SPEECH | 18131 | 0% | 13% | 8 | Search FREEDOM+OF+SPEECH | Search FREEDOM+OF+SPEECH |
| 2 | 1ST AMENDMENT | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search 1ST+AMENDMENT | Search 1ST+AMENDMENT |
| 3 | ALTERNATIVE MASS MEDIA | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search ALTERNATIVE+MASS+MEDIA | Search ALTERNATIVE+MASS+MEDIA |
| 4 | ANONYMOUS SPEECH | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search ANONYMOUS+SPEECH | Search ANONYMOUS+SPEECH |
| 5 | ARTICLE 191 A | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search ARTICLE+191+A | Search ARTICLE+191+A |
| 6 | CHILD INTERNET PROTECTION ACT | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search CHILD+INTERNET+PROTECTION+ACT | Search CHILD+INTERNET+PROTECTION+ACT |
| 7 | CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search CLEAR+AND+PRESENT+DANGER | Search CLEAR+AND+PRESENT+DANGER |
| 8 | CONTENT NEUTRALITY | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search CONTENT+NEUTRALITY | Search CONTENT+NEUTRALITY |
| 9 | DIGITAL LIBERTIES | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search DIGITAL+LIBERTIES | Search DIGITAL+LIBERTIES |
| 10 | EXPRESSIVE DISCRIMINATION | 17578 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search EXPRESSIVE+DISCRIMINATION | Search EXPRESSIVE+DISCRIMINATION |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
| Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ROSENTHAL, L , (2008) THE EMERGING FIRST AMENDMENT LAW OF MANAGERIAL PREROGATIVE.FORDHAM LAW REVIEW. VOL. 77. ISSUE 1. P. 33-112 | 58 | 79% | 11 |
| 2 | BERMAN, MN , (2002) COMMERCIAL SPEECH AND THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS DOCTRINE: A SECOND LOOK AT "THE GREATER INCLUDES THE LESSER".VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW. VOL. 55. ISSUE 3. P. 693 -796 | 42 | 82% | 12 |
| 3 | FREEDMAN, EM , (1996) A LOT MORE COMES INTO FOCUS WHEN YOU REMOVE THE LENS CAP: WHY PROLIFERATING NEW COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES MAKE IT PARTICULARLY URGENT FOR THE SUPREME COURT TO ABANDON ITS INSIDE-OUT APPROACH TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND BRING OBSCENITY, FIGHTING WORDS, AND GROUP LIBEL WITHIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT.IOWA LAW REVIEW. VOL. 81. ISSUE 4. P. 883 -968 | 68 | 59% | 9 |
| 4 | ARDITO, A , (2013) SOCIAL MEDIA, ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT.ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW. VOL. 65. ISSUE 2. P. 301-386 | 28 | 85% | 1 |
| 5 | CHEN, J , (2005) CONDUIT-BASED REGULATION OF SPEECH.DUKE LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 54. ISSUE 6. P. 1359-1456 | 51 | 54% | 4 |
| 6 | YOO, CS , (2003) THE RISE AND DEMISE OF THE TECHNOLOGY-SPECIFIC APPROACH TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT.GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 91. ISSUE 2. P. 245-356 | 42 | 68% | 17 |
| 7 | SCHAUER, F , (1998) PRINCIPLES, INSTITUTIONS, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT.HARVARD LAW REVIEW. VOL. 112. ISSUE 1. P. 84 -120 | 40 | 77% | 65 |
| 8 | CAMPBELL, WJ , (2016) SPEECH-FACILITATING CONDUCT.STANFORD LAW REVIEW. VOL. 68. ISSUE 1. P. 1 -65 | 30 | 58% | 2 |
| 9 | STERN, N , (2011) THE SUBORDINATE STATUS OF NEGATIVE SPEECH RIGHTS.BUFFALO LAW REVIEW. VOL. 59. ISSUE 4. P. 847-936 | 30 | 71% | 3 |
| 10 | CORBIN, CM , (2008) MIXED SPEECH: WHEN SPEECH IS BOTH PRIVATE AND GOVERNMENTAL.NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 83. ISSUE 3. P. 605-692 | 26 | 79% | 21 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |