Class information for: |
Basic class information |
| Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35854 | 90 | 35.5 | 8% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
| Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | ECONOMICS//EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH//PSYCHOL | 3876184 |
| 106 | 3 | LAW//FORDHAM LAW REVIEW//BUSINESS LAWYER | 71924 |
| 3010 | 2 | LAW//HARVARD CIVIL RIGHTS-CIVIL LIBERTIES LAW REVIEW//NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | 2534 |
| 35854 | 1 | ARCHAEOL ETHNOG PROGRAM//ETHNOGRAPHIC PROGRAM EVALUATION//FEDERAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT | 90 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
| rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ARCHAEOL ETHNOG PROGRAM | address | 339285 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
| 2 | ETHNOGRAPHIC PROGRAM EVALUATION | authKW | 339285 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
| 3 | FEDERAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT | authKW | 339285 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
| 4 | FEDERAL WORKPLACE ETHICAL ISSUES IN | authKW | 339285 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
| 5 | NATIVE AMERICAN GRAVES PROTECTION AND REPATRIATION ACT | authKW | 339285 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
| 6 | HASTINGS LAW LIB | address | 169641 | 1% | 50% | 1 |
| 7 | OFF SOLICITOR | address | 169641 | 1% | 50% | 1 |
| 8 | SECUR ARCHIVE | address | 169641 | 1% | 50% | 1 |
| 9 | HUMAN RIGHTS INITIAT | address | 113094 | 1% | 33% | 1 |
| 10 | NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT | authKW | 113094 | 1% | 33% | 1 |
Web of Science journal categories |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Law | 10434 | 63% | 0% | 57 |
| 2 | Anthropology | 288 | 9% | 0% | 8 |
| 3 | Political Science | 181 | 9% | 0% | 8 |
| 4 | Film, Radio, Television | 180 | 2% | 0% | 2 |
| 5 | Family Studies | 114 | 4% | 0% | 4 |
| 6 | Information Science & Library Science | 103 | 6% | 0% | 5 |
| 7 | Psychology, Clinical | 47 | 6% | 0% | 5 |
| 8 | Education & Educational Research | 43 | 6% | 0% | 5 |
| 9 | Social Issues | 40 | 2% | 0% | 2 |
| 10 | Ethnic Studies | 34 | 1% | 0% | 1 |
Address terms |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ARCHAEOL ETHNOG PROGRAM | 339285 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
| 2 | HASTINGS LAW LIB | 169641 | 1% | 50% | 1 |
| 3 | OFF SOLICITOR | 169641 | 1% | 50% | 1 |
| 4 | SECUR ARCHIVE | 169641 | 1% | 50% | 1 |
| 5 | HUMAN RIGHTS INITIAT | 113094 | 1% | 33% | 1 |
| 6 | MORITZ LAW LIB | 84820 | 1% | 25% | 1 |
| 7 | QUALITAT INQUIRY PROGRAM | 67855 | 1% | 20% | 1 |
| 8 | COLUMBIA LAW | 14135 | 1% | 4% | 1 |
| 9 | CHICAGO KENT LAW | 6167 | 1% | 2% | 1 |
| 10 | INTERIOR | 3726 | 1% | 1% | 1 |
Journals |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW | 54354 | 12% | 1% | 11 |
| 2 | DUKE LAW JOURNAL | 43443 | 13% | 1% | 12 |
| 3 | ANTHROPOLOGY & EDUCATION QUARTERLY | 7163 | 4% | 1% | 4 |
| 4 | LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL | 4076 | 3% | 0% | 3 |
| 5 | POLITIX | 3726 | 1% | 1% | 1 |
| 6 | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY | 3425 | 1% | 1% | 1 |
| 7 | EMORY LAW JOURNAL | 2849 | 1% | 1% | 1 |
| 8 | CORNELL LAW REVIEW | 2633 | 3% | 0% | 3 |
| 9 | NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | 2427 | 3% | 0% | 3 |
| 10 | RUTGERS LAW REVIEW | 2068 | 2% | 0% | 2 |
Author Key Words |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
| Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WICHMANN, CJ , (1998) RIDDING FOIA OF THOSE "UNANTICIPATED CONSEQUENCES": REPAVING A NECESSARY ROAD TO FREEDOM.DUKE LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 47. ISSUE 6. P. 1213-1256 | 9 | 90% | 6 |
| 2 | MARTYNIUK, AO , (1994) AN END TO AN FBI GENERAL PRESUMPTION OF CONFIDENTIALITY UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT EXEMPTION-7(D) - UNITED-STATES-DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE V LANDANO, 113-S CT-2014 (1993).UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI LAW REVIEW. VOL. 63. ISSUE 1. P. 523-563 | 6 | 100% | 0 |
| 3 | HALSTUK, ME , DAVIS, CN , (2002) THE PUBLIC INTEREST BE DAMNED: LOWER COURT TREATMENT OF THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE "CENTRAL PURPOSE" REFORMULATION.ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW. VOL. 54. ISSUE 3. P. 983-1024 | 4 | 100% | 6 |
| 4 | WOLFE, GN , (2013) SMILE FOR THE CAMERA, THE WORLD IS GOING TO SEE THAT MUG: THE DILEMMA OF PRIVACY INTERESTS IN MUG SHOTS.COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW. VOL. 113. ISSUE 8. P. 2227-2276 | 7 | 39% | 1 |
| 5 | BEALL, CP , (1996) THE EXALTATION OF PRIVACY DOCTRINES OVER PUBLIC INFORMATION LAW.DUKE LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 45. ISSUE 6. P. 1249-1300 | 5 | 83% | 8 |
| 6 | REES, AE , (1995) RECENT DEVELOPMENTS REGARDING THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT - A PROLOGUE TO A FARCE OR A TRAGEDY - OR PERHAPS BOTH.DUKE LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 44. ISSUE 6. P. 1183-1223 | 4 | 100% | 6 |
| 7 | LOWE, MM , (1994) THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT IN 1993-1994.DUKE LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 43. ISSUE 6. P. 1282-1316 | 4 | 100% | 5 |
| 8 | WESSLER, NF , (2010) "[WE] CAN NEITHER CONFIRM NOR DENY THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF RECORDS RESPONSIVE TO YOUR REQUEST": REFORMING THE GLOMAR RESPONSE UNDER FOIA.NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 85. ISSUE 4. P. 1381-1415 | 4 | 57% | 2 |
| 9 | SHEPHARD, K , (2013) MUG SHOT DISCLOSURE UNDER FOIA: DOES PRIVACY OR PUBLIC INTEREST PREVAIL?.NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 108. ISSUE 1. P. 343 -377 | 2 | 100% | 0 |
| 10 | APFELROTH, J , (2006) THE OPEN GOVERNMENT ACT: A PROPOSED BILL TO ENSURE THE EFFICIENT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT.ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW. VOL. 58. ISSUE 1. P. 219-233 | 2 | 100% | 2 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |