Class information for: |
Basic class information |
Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
---|---|---|---|
1589 | 2578 | 49.3 | 41% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 | ECONOMICS//EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH//PSYCHOL | 3876184 |
17 | 3 | BUSINESS//BUSINESS, FINANCE//MANAGEMENT | 121089 |
624 | 2 | RESEARCH POLICY//JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER//PATENTS | 13841 |
1589 | 1 | JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER//ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP//TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | 2578 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | journal | 1386343 | 9% | 51% | 228 |
2 | ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP | authKW | 1073821 | 4% | 88% | 103 |
3 | TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | authKW | 690856 | 11% | 21% | 276 |
4 | ENTREPRENEURIAL UNIVERSITY | authKW | 579596 | 3% | 74% | 66 |
5 | RESEARCH POLICY | journal | 535466 | 13% | 13% | 342 |
6 | UNIVERSITY SPIN OFFS | authKW | 477651 | 2% | 92% | 44 |
7 | UNIVERSITY INDUSTRY COLLABORATION | authKW | 463159 | 2% | 66% | 59 |
8 | UNIVERSITY INDUSTRY RELATIONS | authKW | 375598 | 2% | 77% | 41 |
9 | SCIENCE PARKS | authKW | 372318 | 2% | 60% | 52 |
10 | ACADEMIC PATENTING | authKW | 367483 | 1% | 97% | 32 |
Web of Science journal categories |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Management | 158144 | 54% | 1% | 1385 |
2 | Planning & Development | 59695 | 21% | 1% | 529 |
3 | Business | 20328 | 17% | 0% | 426 |
4 | Engineering, Industrial | 8030 | 10% | 0% | 254 |
5 | Public Administration | 6182 | 5% | 0% | 137 |
6 | Operations Research & Management Science | 4896 | 10% | 0% | 264 |
7 | Information Science & Library Science | 4759 | 7% | 0% | 180 |
8 | Economics | 4108 | 14% | 0% | 370 |
9 | Education & Educational Research | 2602 | 8% | 0% | 202 |
10 | History & Philosophy of Science | 2586 | 4% | 0% | 92 |
Address terms |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MANAGEMENT BUY OUT | 81329 | 1% | 30% | 23 |
2 | INGENIO | 71157 | 1% | 26% | 23 |
3 | SCI TO BUSINESS MKT | 59214 | 0% | 100% | 5 |
4 | SCI SYST ASSESSMENT | 36261 | 0% | 44% | 7 |
5 | ANAL EVALUAT TECH CHANGE | 35528 | 0% | 100% | 3 |
6 | CISALPINO COMPARAT STUDIES EUROPE CCSE | 35528 | 0% | 100% | 3 |
7 | ADV SOCIAL STUDIES IESA | 31578 | 0% | 67% | 4 |
8 | HUMAN SCI TECHNOL ADV H STAR | 31578 | 0% | 67% | 4 |
9 | IND DYNAM | 29140 | 0% | 31% | 8 |
10 | INGENIO CSIC UPV | 27937 | 0% | 20% | 12 |
Journals |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | 1386343 | 9% | 51% | 228 |
2 | RESEARCH POLICY | 535466 | 13% | 13% | 342 |
3 | TECHNOVATION | 188068 | 6% | 10% | 164 |
4 | SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY | 175318 | 3% | 19% | 80 |
5 | RESEARCH EVALUATION | 98004 | 2% | 13% | 62 |
6 | MINERVA | 71546 | 2% | 10% | 60 |
7 | R & D MANAGEMENT | 42389 | 2% | 6% | 62 |
8 | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT | 25470 | 2% | 3% | 62 |
9 | TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT | 25379 | 2% | 5% | 46 |
10 | INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION | 19389 | 1% | 7% | 22 |
Author Key Words |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PERKMANN, M , TARTARI, V , MCKELVEY, M , AUTIO, E , BROSTROM, A , D'ESTE, P , FINI, R , GEUNA, A , GRIMALDI, R , HUGHES, A , ET AL (2013) ACADEMIC ENGAGEMENT AND COMMERCIALISATION: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY RELATIONS.RESEARCH POLICY. VOL. 42. ISSUE 2. P. 423-442 | 90 | 90% | 133 |
2 | ROTHAERMEL, FT , AGUNG, SD , JIANG, L , (2007) UNIVERSITY ENTREPRENEURSHIP: A TAXONOMY OF THE LITERATURE.INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE. VOL. 16. ISSUE 4. P. 691-791 | 120 | 86% | 281 |
3 | GERBIN, A , DRNOVSEK, M , (2016) DETERMINANTS AND PUBLIC POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF ACADEMIC-INDUSTRY KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER IN LIFE SCIENCES: A REVIEW AND A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK.JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER. VOL. 41. ISSUE 5. P. 979 -1076 | 108 | 88% | 0 |
4 | HUYGHE, A , KNOCKAERT, M , PIVA, E , WRIGHT, M , (2016) ARE RESEARCHERS DELIBERATELY BYPASSING THE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER OFFICE? AN ANALYSIS OF TTO AWARENESS.SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS. VOL. 47. ISSUE 3. P. 589 -607 | 68 | 76% | 1 |
5 | PERKMANN, M , D'ESTE, P , (2011) WHY DO ACADEMICS ENGAGE WITH INDUSTRY? THE ENTREPRENEURIAL UNIVERSITY AND INDIVIDUAL MOTIVATIONS.JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER. VOL. 36. ISSUE 3. P. 316 -339 | 52 | 93% | 82 |
6 | ANKRAH, S , AL-TABBAA, O , (2015) UNIVERSITIES-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT. VOL. 31. ISSUE 3. P. 387 -408 | 79 | 59% | 9 |
7 | MUSCIO, A , QUAGLIONE, D , RAMACIOTTI, L , (2016) THE EFFECTS OF UNIVERSITY RULES ON SPINOFF CREATION: THE CASE OF ACADEMIA IN ITALY.RESEARCH POLICY. VOL. 45. ISSUE 7. P. 1386 -1396 | 50 | 94% | 1 |
8 | PEREZ, MTA , CARRASCO, FRC , (2009) ELABORATING A FRAMEWORK TO ANALYSE THE UNIVERSITY SPIN-OFF FORMATION.REVISTA DE ECONOMIA MUNDIAL. VOL. . ISSUE 23. P. 23-51 | 62 | 97% | 0 |
9 | BRADLEY, SR , HAYTER, CS , LINK, AN , (2013) PROOF OF CONCEPT CENTERS IN THE UNITED STATES: AN EXPLORATORY LOOK.JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER. VOL. 38. ISSUE 4. P. 349-381 | 60 | 85% | 6 |
10 | ANKRAH, SN , BURGESS, TF , GRIMSHAW, P , SHAW, NE , (2013) ASKING BOTH UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY ACTORS ABOUT THEIR ENGAGEMENT IN KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: WHAT SINGLE-GROUP STUDIES OF MOTIVES OMIT.TECHNOVATION. VOL. 33. ISSUE 2-3. P. 50-65 | 55 | 83% | 22 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |