56. References

5. References 1. Harwood, J. 2006. Engineering Education between Science and Practice. History and Technology: An International Journal, 22:1, 53-79.

2. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning, I – Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46:1, 4-11.

3. Dahlgren, L-O., Pramling, I. 1981. Högskolestudier och omvärldsuppfattning. Struktur och innehåll i nybörjarstudenters uppfattning av kunskap, inlärning och högre studier samt kvalifikationer och problemområden av ekonomisk, teknisk, psykologisk och medicinsk natur. Gothenburg: Pedagogiska Institutionen, Göteborgs universitet.

4. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Third Edition. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

5. Popov, A. A. (2003). Final undergraduate project in engineering: Towards

more efficient and effective tutorials, European Journal of Engineering Education, 28:1, 17-26.

6. Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., and Brodeur, D. (2007). Rethinking Engineering Education. The CDIO Approach, Springer, New York.

7. Personal communication with a Teacher at KTH in 2012.

8. Hagman, L . A., Norell Bergendahl, M., & Ritzén, S. (2001). Teaching in Integrated Product Development: experiences from project based learning, The International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 01, aug 2001

9. http://www.cdio.org/files/crawleyetalcdiosyllabus2.0paper_29may2013.pdf

10. Eriksson, M., & Lilliesköld, J. (2010). Handbook for Small Projects. Stockholm: Liber.

11. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_breakdown_structure

12. Kolmos, A., Xiangyun, D., Holgaard, J. E., & Jensen, L. P. (2008). Facilitation in a PBL environment, Aalborg University 2008.

13. Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95: 2, 123-138.

14. Davis, C. & Wilcock, E. (2004). Case studies in engineering, in C. Baillie & I. Moore (eds) Effective learning and teaching in Engineering, Routledge: New York, pp. 51-71.

15. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview, Theory Into

Practice, 41:4, 212-218.

16. Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative.2 ed. Oxford: Capstone

17. Berglund, A., & Ritzén, S. (2009). Towards Individual Innovation Capability – The Assessment of Idea-Generating Methods and Creativity in a Capstone Design Course. In Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on International Design and Design Education, ASME 09, San Diego.

18. www.mountaingoatsoftware.com/agile/scrum

19. www.crisp.se/gratis-material-och-guider/kanban

20. Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (2011). Peer Learning in Higher Eduation: Learning from & With Each Other.

21. http://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/mbti-basics/

* Belbin, R. M. (1993). Team Roles at Work. Butterworth.Heinemann, Oxford.
23. Carroll, J., & Ryan, J. (2005). Teaching international students improving learning for all. London, New York: Routledge.

24. Eklund, S. (2011). Att arbeta i project – individen, gruppen, ledaren. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

25. Gibbs G. (1994). Learning in Teams: A Tutor Guide. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development.

26. http://www.bizforum.org/Journal/www_journalDGC003.htm, David Chaudron, PhD, Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Susan Heathfield, Human Resources Expert.

27. Gibbs G. (1994) Learning in Teams: A Student Manual. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development.

28. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback, Review of Educational Research, 77: 1, 81-112.

29. Ashby, M. (2005). How to Write a Paper. Engineering Department, University of Cambridge. http://www-mech.eng.cam.ac.uk/mmd/ashby-paper-V6.pdf

30. Elmgren, M., & Henriksson, A-S. (2014). Academic Teaching. Studentlitteratur.

31. Berglund, A., & Ritzén,S. (2012). Prototyping – The collaborative Mediator. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Product Design Education EPDE’12, Antwerp.

32. Berglund, A., & Leifer, L. (2013). Why we prototype! An International Comparison of the Linkage between Embedded Knowledge and Objective Learning, Engineering Education, 8:1, 2-15.

33. http://intra.kth.se/regelverk/policyer/policy-for-intellektuella-tillgangar-skapade-vid-kth-1.456590

34. LEQ, https://www.kth.se/social/group/guide-to-challenge-d/

35. CEQ, http://www.ceq.lth.se/

Additional links:

Solar powered boat: http://kthsolarboat.se/index.php

Sanitation in Tanzania: http://www.aalto.fi/en/current/news/2013-07-03-002/

Stanford methods to improve design thinking practice: http://dschool.stanford.edu/use-our-methods/

Brainstorming: www.me.umn.edu/courses/me2011/handouts/brainstorm.pdf

Scrum and Kanban: www.infoq.com/minibooks/scrum-xp-from-the-trenches and www.infoq.com/minibooks/kanban-scrum-minibook

Belbin’s team roles: http://www.belbin.com/rte.asp?id=8

10 short films staging a team development process: http://archive.learnhigher.ac.uk/groupwork/episodes.php

David Gosling and Jenny Moon: "How to Use Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria", http://www.seec.org.uk/publications/how-use-learning-outcomes-and-assessment-criteria

Portfolios: https://arc.uchicago.edu/reese/projects/using-portfolios-promote-knowledge-integration-engineering-education

Web version of this Guide: https://www.kth.se/social/group/guide-to-challenge-d/