Till KTH:s startsida Till KTH:s startsida

Visa version

Version skapad av Jan Scheffel 2019-08-16 12:02

Visa < föregående | nästa >
Jämför < föregående | nästa >

Course data & Course analysis

To see the whole table click on the arrow symbol (Min/Max) at the far right corner. The full page contents will be shown and the menu will be hidden. Click the arrows again to retrieve the menu. 

The symbol "-----^^-----" refers to ditto marks with respect to text below.

Course
offering
Examiner and course responsible Compulsory in which program (period and year) CDIO content  Other program related course content

Form of examination and
when it is carried out

# reg.
students
Examination rate; of active (total). Grading: P/F. Changes made in course offering (examples from course analysis) Course analysis (upload document)
HT2019 Jan Scheffel and
Per Brunsell
Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week.                  - -----^^----- 25 (all active) 88 % (88 %) • Two electronic course questionnaires were integrated into the course (now 100 % response frequency).
• Course analysis was written in English for the first time.
• Course book is now printed with a subject index.
• Some more graphical material was added to the lectures.
Course analysis 2019
HT2018 Jan Scheffel and
Per Brunsell
Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week.                  - -----^^----- 10 (8 active) 100 % (80 %) • The course is now more visible as elective for students taking the sustainable energy master TSUEM.  Course analysis 2018
HT2017 Jan Scheffel and
Per Brunsell
Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week.                  - -----^^----- 22 (15 active) 93 % (64 %) • Canvas, the new course web platform, was used in the course
• LEQ, the web based course evaluation and analysis tool, was employed
Course analysis 2017
HT2016 Jan Scheffel and
Per Brunsell
Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week.                  - -----^^----- 25 
(22 active)
91 % (80 %) • The course plan has been corrected 
and improved, for example regarding pre-knowledge requirements.
• Printing errors in course book and 
exercise booklet have been corrected.
• Now better information about plagiarisation in first lecture.
Course analysis 2016
HT2015 Jan Scheffel and
Per Brunsell
Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week.                  - -----^^----- 22
(19 active)
84 % (73 %) • Updated, PowerPoint pictures are now used
in first week's lectures rather than transparencies.
• "Colour sheet questions" are introduced on
some lectures (easier to handle than clickers).
Course analysis 2015
HT2014 Jan Scheffel and
Per Brunsell
Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week.                  - -----^^----- 16
(15 active)
93 % (88 %) • In order to attract more students we have 
contacted the course MJ2405 Sustainable 
Power Generation. Fusion energy is now a module of that course.
• We have recorded 10 video lectures about fusion, being accessible in MJ2405,
as well as on the home page of this course.
Course analysis 2014
HT2013 Jan Scheffel and
Per Brunsell
Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week.                  - -----^^----- 15
(13 active)
92 % (80 %) • Some parts of the educational material was updated. Course analysis 2013
HT2012 Jan Scheffel and
Per Brunsell
Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week.                  -

-----^^-----

11
(10 active)
90 % (82 %) • The first week's data on energy sources and
the global energy background was updated.
• Course PM was modified to better inform on
what is regarded as allowed student collaboration in solving home assignments.
Course analysis 2012
HT2011 Jan Scheffel and
Per Brunsell
Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week.                  -

-----^^-----

36
(30 active)
87 % (72 %) • Certain clarifications were made in the texts
for the home assignments.
• The mini group works were adjusted to mini-
mise stress.
Course analysis 2011
HT2010 Jan Scheffel and
Per Brunsell
Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week.                  - -----^^----- 38
(34 active)
89 % • An early quiz examined the student's pre-
knowledge, in particular their deep know-
ledge of certain topics that are needed for the
course.
• The student's deep knowledge was again
assessed at the end of the course. In future
course offerings these questions will be part
of the examination of the last course week.
The last course week will thus have a larger
weight in the total score required for pass grade.
Course analysis 2010
HT2009 Jan Scheffel and
Per Brunsell
Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week.                  - -----^^----- 49 92 % • The course book (now in English) was
thoroughly revised.
Course analysis 2009
HT2008 Jan Scheffel and
Per Brunsell
Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week.                  - -----^^----- 19 95 % • The course is now completely held in English,
since it is part of Master programs like Erasmus Mundus. 
• The home assignments were made more
substantial; many students found them "too
easy" earlier. 
Course analysis 2008
HT2007 Jan Scheffel and
Per Brunsell
Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week.                  -

Continual examination, 
each week
home assignments + 
mini group work

The course 6 hp (credits) are distributed as:
4.5 hp - home assignments
1.5 hp - mini group works

No final exam. 
Grades: P/F.

31 90 % • The course book (in LaTex) was translated to English.
• Nearly all course material was revised; home
page, course PM, transparencies, mini group
works, home assignments, course
questionnaire .
Course analysis 2007