Course data & Course analysis

To see the whole table click on the arrow symbol (Min/Max) at the far right corner. The full page contents will be shown and the menu will be hidden. Click the arrows again to retrieve the menu.

The symbol "-----^^-----" refers to ditto marks with respect to text below.

Courseoffering Examiner and course responsible Compulsory in which program (period and year) CDIO content Other program related course content Form of examination and when it is carried out

# reg.students Examination rate; of active (total). Grading: P/F. Changes made in course offering (examples from course analysis) Course analysis (upload document) HT2017 Jan Scheffel andPer Brunsell

Eligible, master level

Group work: mini group work each course week. - -----^^-----

22 (15 active)

93 % (64 %)

• Canvas, the new course web platform, was used• LEQ, the web based course evaluation and analysis tool, was employed

Course analysis 2017 HT2016 Jan Scheffel andPer Brunsell

Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week. - -----^^-----

25 (22 active)

91 % (80 %)

• The course plan has been corrected and improved, for example regarding pre-knowledge requirements.• Printing errors in course book and exercise booklet have been corrected.• Now better information about plagiarisation in first lecture.

Course analysis 2016 HT2015 Jan Scheffel andPer Brunsell

Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week. - -----^^-----

22(19 active)

84 % (73 %) • Updated, PowerPoint pictures are now usedin first week's lectures rather than transparencies.• "Colour sheet questions" are introduced onsome lectures (easier to handle than clickers).

Course analysis 2015 HT2014 Jan Scheffel andPer Brunsell

Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week. - -----^^-----

16(15 active)

93 % (88 %) • In order to attract more students we have contacted the course MJ2405 Sustainable Power Generation. Fusion energy is now a module of that course.• We have recorded 10 video lectures about fusion, being accessible in MJ2405,as well as on the home page of this course.

Course analysis 2014 HT2017 Jan Scheffel andPer Brunsell Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week. - -----^^----- HT2016 Jan Scheffel andPer Brunsell Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week. - -----^^----- HT2015 Jan Scheffel andPer Brunsell Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week. - -----^^----- HT2014 Jan Scheffel andPer Brunsell Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week. - -----^^----- 16(15 active) 93 % (88 %) • In order to attract more students we have contacted the course MJ2405 Sustainable Power Generation. Fusion energy is now a module of that course.• We have recorded 10 video lectures about fusion, being accessible in MJ2405,as well as on the home page of this course. Course analysis 2014 HT2013 Jan Scheffel andPer Brunsell Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week. - -----^^----- 15(13 active) 92 % (80 %) • Some parts of the educational material was updated. Course analysis 2013 HT2012 Jan Scheffel andPer Brunsell Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week. - -----^^-----

11(10 active) 90 % (82 %) • The first week's data on energy sources andthe global energy background was updated.• Course PM was modified to better inform onwhat is regarded as allowed student collaboration in solving home assignments. Course analysis 2012 HT2011 Jan Scheffel andPer Brunsell Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week. - -----^^-----

36(30 active) 87 % (72 %) • Certain clarifications were made in the textsfor the home assignments.• The mini group works were adjusted to mini-mise stress. Course analysis 2011 HT2010 Jan Scheffel andPer Brunsell Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week. - -----^^----- 38(34 active) 89 % • An early quiz examined the student's pre-knowledge, in particular their deep know-ledge of certain topics that are needed for thecourse.• The student's deep knowledge was againassessed at the end of the course. In futurecourse offerings these questions will be partof the examination of the last course week. The last course week will thus have a largerweight in the total score required for pass grade. Course analysis 2010 HT2009 Jan Scheffel andPer Brunsell Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week. - -----^^----- 49 92 % • The course book (now in English) wasthoroughly revised. Course analysis 2009 HT2008 Jan Scheffel andPer Brunsell Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week. - -----^^----- 19 95 % • The course is now completely held in English,since it is part of Master programs like Erasmus Mundus. • The home assignments were made moresubstantial; many students found them "too easy" earlier. Course analysis 2008 HT2007 Jan Scheffel andPer Brunsell Eligible, master level Group work: mini group work each course week. - Continual examination, each weekhome assignments + mini group work

The course 6 hp (credits) are distributed as:4.5 hp - home assignments1.5 hp - mini group works

No final exam. Grades: P/F.

31 90 % • The course book (in LaTex) was translated to English.• Nearly all course material was revised; home page, course PM, transparencies, mini group works, home assignments, course questionnaire . Course analysis 2007