Course data & Course analysis
To see the whole table click on the arrow symbol (Min/Max) at the far right corner. The full page contents will be shown and the menu will be hidden. Click the arrows again to retrieve the menu.
The symbol "-----^^-----" refers to ditto marks with respect to text below.
| Course offering |
Examiner and course responsible | Compulsory in which program (period and year) | CDIO content | Other program related course content |
Form of examination and |
# reg. students |
Examination rate; of active (total). Grading: P/F. | Changes made in course offering (examples from course analysis) | Course analysis (upload document) |
| VT2019 | Jan Scheffel and Per Brunsell |
Eligible, master level | Group work: mini group work each course week. | - | -----^^----- | 25 (all active) | 88 % (88 %) | • Two electronic course surveys were integrated into the course (now 100 % response frequency). • Course analysis was written in English for the first time. • Course book is now printed with a subject index. • Some more graphical material was added to the lectures. |
Course analysis 2019 |
| VT2018 | Jan Scheffel and Per Brunsell |
Eligible, master level | Group work: mini group work each course week. | - | -----^^----- | 10 (8 active) | 100 % (80 %) | • The course is now more visible as elective for students taking the sustainable energy master TSUEM. | Course analysis 2018 |
| VT2017 | Jan Scheffel and Per Brunsell |
Eligible, master level | Group work: mini group work each course week. | - | -----^^----- | 22 (15 active) | 93 % (64 %) | • Canvas, the new course web platform, was used in the course • LEQ, the web based course evaluation and analysis tool, was employed |
Course analysis 2017 |
| VT2016 | Jan Scheffel and Per Brunsell |
Eligible, master level | Group work: mini group work each course week. | - | -----^^----- | 25 (22 active) |
91 % (80 %) | • The course plan has been corrected and improved, for example regarding pre-knowledge requirements. • Printing errors in course book and exercise booklet have been corrected. • Now better information about plagiarisation in first lecture. |
Course analysis 2016 |
| VT2015 | Jan Scheffel and Per Brunsell |
Eligible, master level | Group work: mini group work each course week. | - | -----^^----- | 22 (19 active) |
84 % (73 %) | • Updated, PowerPoint pictures are now used in first week's lectures rather than transparencies. • "Colour sheet questions" are introduced on some lectures (easier to handle than clickers). |
Course analysis 2015 |
| VT2014 | Jan Scheffel and Per Brunsell |
Eligible, master level | Group work: mini group work each course week. | - | -----^^----- | 16 (15 active) |
93 % (88 %) | • In order to attract more students we have contacted the course MJ2405 Sustainable Power Generation. Fusion energy is now a module of that course. • We have recorded 10 video lectures about fusion, being accessible in MJ2405, as well as on the home page of this course. |
Course analysis 2014 |
| VT2013 | Jan Scheffel and Per Brunsell |
Eligible, master level | Group work: mini group work each course week. | - | -----^^----- | 15 (13 active) |
92 % (80 %) | • Some parts of the educational material was updated. | Course analysis 2013 |
| VT2012 | Jan Scheffel and Per Brunsell |
Eligible, master level | Group work: mini group work each course week. | - |
-----^^----- |
11 (10 active) |
90 % (82 %) | • The first week's data on energy sources and the global energy background was updated. • Course PM was modified to better inform on what is regarded as allowed student collaboration in solving home assignments. |
Course analysis 2012 |
| VT2011 | Jan Scheffel and Per Brunsell |
Eligible, master level | Group work: mini group work each course week. | - |
-----^^----- |
36 (30 active) |
87 % (72 %) | • Certain clarifications were made in the texts for the home assignments. • The mini group works were adjusted to mini- mise stress. |
Course analysis 2011 |
| VT2010 | Jan Scheffel and Per Brunsell |
Eligible, master level | Group work: mini group work each course week. | - | -----^^----- | 38 (34 active) |
89 % | • An early quiz examined the student's pre- knowledge, in particular their deep know- ledge of certain topics that are needed for the course. • The student's deep knowledge was again assessed at the end of the course. In future course offerings these questions will be part of the examination of the last course week. The last course week will thus have a larger weight in the total score required for pass grade. |
Course analysis 2010 |
| VT2009 | Jan Scheffel and Per Brunsell |
Eligible, master level | Group work: mini group work each course week. | - | -----^^----- | 49 | 92 % | • The course book (now in English) was thoroughly revised. |
Course analysis 2009 |
| VT2008 | Jan Scheffel and Per Brunsell |
Eligible, master level | Group work: mini group work each course week. | - | -----^^----- | 19 | 95 % | • The course is now completely held in English, since it is part of Master programs like Erasmus Mundus. • The home assignments were made more substantial; many students found them "too easy" earlier. |
Course analysis 2008 |
| VT2007 | Jan Scheffel and Per Brunsell |
Eligible, master level | Group work: mini group work each course week. | - |
Continual examination, The course 6 hp (credits) are distributed as: No final exam. |
31 | 90 % | • The course book (in LaTex) was translated to English. • Nearly all course material was revised; home page, course PM, transparencies, mini group works, home assignments, course questionnaire . |
Course analysis 2007 |