Our point of departure will be practical ethical problems. These will vary each time the course is given but classical examples include conflicts between safety and economy or function, environmental effects of technology, conflicts between the engineer’s professionalism and his/her loyalty to the employer, work with morally dubious technologies, insider problems and industrial espionage, integrity issues related to IT, etc. In order to analyse these issues we will use tools from moral philosophy (ethics). We will acquaint ourselves with important theories from moral philosophy such as utilitarianism and deontological ethics, as well as with useful notions, e.g., moral dilemmas.

An important part of this course is an individually written essay under supervision. This work amounts to a specialisation in an ethical problem that can be selected in accordance with the student’s previous experiences and studies. The main aim of this work is the analysis, from an ethical perspective, of technology relevant to the student’s studies. In order to be able to apply the ethical theories and the tools from the course, substantial familiarity with the relevant technical aspects is required.

On completion of the course, the student should

- be able to account for important ethical theories,

- be able to discuss and analyse, in writing and orally, ethical problems that may arise in engineering work,

- within some engineering or technological field, in a more advanced way be able to analyse ethical problems,

- be able to apply ethical theory and analysis in practical engineering or technological activities.

Schema HT-2021-720
Schema HT-2020-787

Students at KTH with a permanent disability can get support during studies from Funka:

Funka - compensatory support for students with disabilities

A, B, C, D, E, FX, F

• DEL1 - Participation and preparatory assignments, 1.5 credits, Grading scale: P, F
• TENA - Exam, 3.0 credits, Grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
• ÖVN1 - Home assignments, 3.0 credits, Grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F

Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.

The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.

Participation and preparatory assignments ( DEL1 )

Exam ( TENA )

Home assignments ( ÖVN1 )

DEL1 (participation and preparatory assignments), 1.5 credits, grading scale PF

TEN1 (examination), 3.0 credits, grading scale PF

Övn. (written assignment), 3.0 credits, grading scale A-F

The final course grade is determined by the INL1 grade.

• All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
• In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
• In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.