Skip to main content
To KTH's start page

Peer feedback with support of digital technology in visual art education

Time: Fri 2023-09-29 13.00

Location: E 32 , Lindstedtsvägen 3

Video link: https://kth-se.zoom.us/j/68297533404

Language: Swedish

Subject area: Technology and Learning

Doctoral student: Eva-Lena Forslind , Digitalt lärande, Digitalt Lärande, Digital Learning

Opponent: Docent Patrik Hernvall, Stockholms universitet

Supervisor: Professor Stefan Hrastinski, Digitalt lärande; Universitets lektor Ingrid Forsler, Södertörns Högskola; Docent Stefan Stenbom, Digitalt lärande, Lärande i Stem; Universitets lektor Fredrik Enoksson, Digitalt lärande

Export to calendar

Abstract

This licentiate thesis focuses on the development of the idea process in art education using digital peer feedback. In the school subject visual art, the visual idea process, e.g., when students sketch their ideas, is an important phase in a project. When an idea takes form, there is the possibility for considering the idea in a new way, for others to study and discuss it, and most importantly, for generating new ideas. By digitally sharing their visual idea process and providing feedback, students can become more aware of their own and others' creative processes. Peer feedback in this thesis leans on two theories. The first is self-regulated learning, meaning that students formulate goals and identify needs (both their own and others’) when learning. In the feedback activity, the student is responsible for their own idea and for the visual feedback given to other students. They also receive valuable input when providing feedback. The second feedback theory is social constructivism and the zone of proximal development, i.e., the difference between what students accomplish in learning with the help of others and what students accomplish by themselves. In this study it is shown (by focusing on the social aspects of peer feedback) that when students help others, they develop their own products far more than they might have done if working individually. On two occasions, I observed and investigated how students (an eighth-grade and sixth-grade class) developed and digitally shared visual ideas supported by digital peer feedback. Thematic analysis was used on data gathered on both occasions (i.e. in both iterations of the study) to identify different types of feedback provided by students. In the first iteration, the feedback was in written form, and through analysis, five themes were created that described different types of peer feedback. In the second iteration, feedback was provided using various visual techniques, and through the analysis, four themes were formed. In each iteration of the study, four categories were created to describe the degree of change between the first and final sketches. The results suggest that using digital tools and peer feedback activities in visual art could help improve students’ abilities to develop ideas. The methodological contribution of this research is its new use of peer feedback using visual feedback. With this form of feedback, students stayed within one medium, using a sign system to communicate visual solutions on the sketches of other students. At the same time, they received practical tips and direct advice that they could immediately apply to their sketches. 

urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-335478