Author
As we approach 2025, the new research and innovation bill presents both promising opportunities and notable challenges for Swedish universities. Central to the bill are initiatives to establish new Strategic Research Areas (SFOs), addressing societal and technological challenges in fields such as quantum technology, life sciences, and materials science. These align closely with the strengths of SCI School, positioning KTH to play a pivotal role in advancing these fields. However, success will require strategic preparation to secure funding and build collaborative, high-impact research environments.
The bill emphasizes the critical role of free research as the foundation of scientific progress, with significant investments, including 450 million SEK for pioneering research starting in 2026 and 300 million SEK for Excellence Centers. These initiatives align with SCI’s commitment to foundational and theoretical research. However, limited increases in direct university funding raise concerns about long-term stability and infrastructure support, necessitating a careful balance between targeted initiatives and advocating for core funding.
Strategic recruitment offers another key opportunity, with 245 million SEK annually by 2028 dedicated by VR to tenure-track assistant professorships. This provides a pathway for SCI School to attract exceptional early-career researchers, though it demands transparent and strategic alignment to strengthen our research capabilities effectively.
Energy research receives notable support, with substantial funding allocated through the Energy Research Bill, particularly for nuclear energy. SCI School’s expertise in nuclear safety and innovation places it at the forefront of this critical field. Similarly, excellence clusters focusing on quantum technology, AI, and advanced energy systems—supported by funding of up to 40 million SEK annually—represent transformative opportunities for SCI. Quantum technology funding alone will grow to 100 million SEK by 2028. SCI School is well-positioned to contribute significantly to Sweden’s national quantum strategy, but achieving this will require dedicated efforts to secure funding and strengthen our leadership in this rapidly advancing field.
Additional investments, such as support for NORDITA, strengthen Sweden’s position as a global leader in theoretical physics, enhancing SCI’s impact in international collaboration and cutting-edge research.
Preparing for the Challenges Ahead
- To fully capitalize on these opportunities, SCI School must focus on several key priorities:
- Preparing competitive applications for new SFOs and targeted funding calls.
- Aligning recruitment efforts with long-term strategic goals while ensuring transparency and fairness.
- Strengthening collaborations with NORDITA, SciLifeLab, and industry partners to enhance impact.
- Advocating for increased direct funding to ensure stable and flexible support for core operations.
While the limited increase in direct university funding remains a concern, proactive and coordinated efforts will be essential to maintaining excellence and securing growth in this dynamic environment.
As we look ahead to 2025, SCI School must approach these opportunities with careful planning, collaborative efforts, and strategic vision to advance our research and innovation agenda. Addressing these challenges will require a coordinated and thoughtful approach to ensure sustainable growth and academic excellence.
Wishing everyone a productive and inspiring start to the new year.
Author
The responsibilities of the faculty at the School of Engineering Sciences (SCI) at KTH have evolved significantly over time, reflecting the increasing demands in education, research, and academic service. As these responsibilities grow and diversify, we must approach them collaboratively, recognizing our shared role in sustaining excellence across all areas.
The SCI faculty plays a pivotal role in KTH’s mission, contributing 22.5% of the university’s GRU funding and producing approximately 3,300 full-time student equivalents (HST), corresponding to around 18 HST per faculty member. Additionally, the faculty supports internal academic service equivalent to 15 full-time positions, shared among approximately 70 faculty members.
To ensure a fair and transparent distribution of responsibilities, we have developed a structured framework that is based on our core responsibilities—Education and Research—while also taking into account Academic Service. This framework formalizes the approach already largely followed at SCI, reflecting shared practices that support the collaborative spirit of our academic community. Education includes activities such as undergraduate teaching (including supervision), graduate education (excluding PhD supervision), professional development, and other KTH-related teaching initiatives. Research encompasses areas such as independent research, PhD supervision, research leadership, and external collaboration. Academic Service involves roles such as leadership in education (e.g., GA, PA, directors of studies), departmental leadership (e.g., head of department, deputy head, division head), school-level leadership (including faculty board roles), and KTH central assignments.
To maintain alignment with the school’s strategic goals, SCI has introduced proportional guidelines for balancing responsibilities across faculty positions. These guidelines are summarized in the table below:
| Position |
Education + Academic Service |
Research |
| Assistant Professor |
At least 20% |
Up to 80% |
| Associate Professor |
At least 25% |
Up to 75% |
| Professor |
At least 30% |
Up to 70% |
Download the guidelines: En uppdragsbeskrivning för fakulteten vid skolan för
teknikvetenskap (SCI)
These guidelines aim to ensure a sustainable and transparent allocation of tasks across different roles. Importantly, the distribution is not directly tied to financial allocations, and exceptions may be addressed on a case-by-case basis through discussions with the Head of Department, who holds the ultimate responsibility for the distribution of faculty responsibility.
An important part of this framework is that these allocations and expectations will be discussed annually during individual development meetings (medarbetarsamtal). This process ensures that responsibilities are regularly reviewed and adjusted to align with both individual aspirations and institutional goals.
By embracing these shared principles and working together, we can continue to foster a thriving academic environment that supports both individual growth and collective success, ensuring that SCI remains a cornerstone of excellence at KTH.
Author
As dean, I’m delighted to share news of our latest faculty promotions. This year, we’re especially thrilled to announce that out of nine new full professors, five are women, alongside one new female associate professor. These promotions are a testament to the exceptional talent and dedication across our faculty, reflecting our commitment to an environment where everyone can thrive and reach their full potential.
This progress aligns with our broader goal of fostering career advancement that is both inclusive and based on the highest standards in teaching, research, and service.
In addition to celebrating these achievements, I’d like to introduce the newly published report on a proposed renewed career system. This report outlines potential pathways to create a more stable and supportive working environment for all faculty members. Over the coming months, we will engage in discussions around these recommendations, gathering input from all stakeholders. Our shared goal is to establish a career structure that provides clear, attainable milestones and fosters both professional growth and well-being. It is essential that our approach to career advancement and international recruitment is built on a well-defined framework, with transparent standards and a stable, supportive work environment.
At the school level, we will soon provide details on a renewed financial system that reflects a clearer faculty profile. This topic, among others, can be discussed at the December school breakfast meeting and other relevant forums.
I encourage everyone to participate in these upcoming conversations, sharing your perspectives and ideas. Together, we can shape a career system that not only supports academic excellence but also builds a thriving, inclusive academic community.
Author
I would like to share reflections on two recent, significant discussions with focus on the School’s strategic direction. On October 16-17, we held a management retreat centered on key faculty matters, with emphasis on reexamining our school’s financial model at a foundational level. I deeply appreciate the openness and collegiality demonstrated by all department heads. Your collective willingness to understand the distinct challenges across departments, coupled with a strong commitment to constructive collaboration, has been invaluable. This exchange has laid a strong foundation and is a first step for developing a sustainable, equitable model that aligns resources with departmental and school-wide priorities.
In addition, on October 21, we held our “verksamhetsdialog” with KTH’s leadership, including the president, vice president, faculty dean, and faculty vice dean. This session covered several points: our strategies for enhancing teaching revenues, initiatives for sustaining high-quality education programs, the school’s financial performance, and our broader research and reform agenda. A key message conveyed was that research at the SCI school serves as a flagship for KTH, reflecting our success in securing competitive grants and achieving international distinction. However, we highlighted challenges in two particular areas where we feel our potential remains underutilized. First, theoretical research often lacks access to comparable levels of external funding despite our considerable strength and potential in this domain. Second, research requiring specialized laboratory resources faces unique funding limitations when compared to larger, more generalized research infrastructures.
Both the retreat and the operational dialog underscore our shared commitment to fostering an environment of academic excellence through transparent and constructive collaboration.
Author
The School of Engineering Sciences at KTH is responsible for one of the university’s most prestigious programs: Engineering Physics. Over the years, this program has consistently attracted numerous applications and exceptionally talented students. It remains a cornerstone of our academic offerings, with a solid reputation and a strong academic foundation.
Last week, we had the pleasure of welcoming the class of 1964, who visited us to celebrate their 60-year reunion. It was an inspiring meeting, blending nostalgia with forward-looking reflections. One notable moment during the reunion was meeting the only female student from the class of 1964, who attended the event. This reminds us of the progress we have made, as today around 20% of our Engineering Physics students are women. However, while we’ve seen improvement, there is still much more work to be done to achieve true gender balance.
During their visit, Gunnar Tibert and I presented the current state of the program and the school, highlighting our high international rankings, the diverse specializations offered, and the range of master’s programs available.
Our guests were impressed by the development but also expressed thoughtful concerns about how these significant changes have affected the quality of education (how can “Complex analysis” be an optional course they commented several times).
They were particularly interested in how rapid technological advancements, especially the rise of AI, have influenced the study habits and learning approaches of today’s students.
It became clear from these discussions that we must strike a careful balance between progress and tradition. On one hand, continuous innovation—such as the integration of AI—has opened exciting new opportunities for both students and researchers. These tools allow us to tackle complex problems and prepare students for emerging challenges. However, it is essential not to lose sight of the core values that have always underpinned Engineering Physics, such as critical thinking and deep theoretical understanding.
It is crucial to embrace progress and avoid being locked in the status quo. The world is evolving rapidly, and so must we. However, as we innovate, we must also ensure that we preserve the traditions that foster deep, long-term thinking and intellectual rigor.
In my opinion, the key lies in embracing innovation while maintaining the best of our traditions. This balance will allow us to continue educating future leaders and ensuring that KTH’s Engineering Physics program remains at the forefront of excellence.
