In what ways should universities be equipped to drive social development, technological progress and democracy? How should they be governed, organised and financed to ensure the long-term success of Swedish research and education?
These are some of the questions that need to be analyzed in the current climate. The role of universities in society has not been analysed in depth or in a comprehensive manner for a long time, focusing on issues relating to universities as a central and important social institution. While there is often debate about how universities can contribute to school problems or the provision of skills for welfare and industry competitiveness, we rarely ask how universities themselves need to be shaped for such purposes. However, we rarely ask ourselves how universities need to be fundamentally shaped for such purposes.
The major studies carried out in the 1960s and 1970s, which led to far-reaching reforms, were perhaps the last time that the big questions about the university sector were really asked and given space in studies, debates and policy proposals. Today, universities are regarded as little more than a residual societal item that must deliver for the needs of other sectors without considering how they would need to be equipped to do so.
It was therefore gratifying that the government opened the door to an investigation about the universities’ form of association in its welcomed research and innovation bill. This gave me hope that the time had come to address the important issues and regift the question of the form of association, governance, organisation and funding, which has been overlooked since several previous inquiries were carried out without yielding any significant results.
However, a parliamentary majority has now formed that is against carrying out such an inquiry. It is not at all surprising that the opposition is opposed to the government’s policy. For an inquiry into the form of association to be successful, it is important that there is a parliamentary agreement so that a majority still considers the issue important and is willing to participate in the discussion and analysis.
It is therefore disappointing for two reasons that two parties that form a majority in the parliamentary education committee are stopping the investigation. Firstly, it is worrying that there is no consensus on the need to investigate how universities should be organised to guarantee autonomy and the ability to contribute to long-term societal development. Secondly, it is disappointing that this lack of consensus has led to a parliamentary majority not wanting the issue to be investigated at all.
Let us hope that, despite its limited scope for manoeuvre, the government will nevertheless move forward with the issue and devote time to establishing a broad political consensus on the need for change!