Class information for: |
Basic class information |
Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
---|---|---|---|
6060 | 1537 | 27.4 | 74% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
---|---|---|---|
6 | 4 | GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY//ONCOLOGY//SURGERY | 1371034 |
212 | 3 | GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY//LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY//PRIMARY BILIARY CIRRHOSIS | 51420 |
240 | 2 | LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY//GALLSTONES//CHOLECYSTECTOMY | 20041 |
6060 | 1 | CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS//COMMON BILE DUCT STONES//COMMON BILE DUCT EXPLORATION | 1537 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS | authKW | 2005314 | 15% | 43% | 235 |
2 | COMMON BILE DUCT STONES | authKW | 1462603 | 9% | 52% | 141 |
3 | COMMON BILE DUCT EXPLORATION | authKW | 883255 | 3% | 91% | 49 |
4 | LAPAROSCOPIC COMMON BILE DUCT EXPLORATION | authKW | 651928 | 2% | 86% | 38 |
5 | CHOLEDOCHOTOMY | authKW | 488580 | 2% | 72% | 34 |
6 | INTRAOPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY | authKW | 472928 | 3% | 48% | 50 |
7 | LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY | authKW | 419135 | 14% | 10% | 219 |
8 | COMMON BILE DUCT | authKW | 260850 | 5% | 19% | 70 |
9 | CHOLEDOCHOSCOPY | authKW | 203726 | 1% | 51% | 20 |
10 | ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY | authKW | 200339 | 4% | 17% | 59 |
Web of Science journal categories |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Surgery | 28208 | 71% | 0% | 1093 |
2 | Gastroenterology & Hepatology | 12176 | 27% | 0% | 418 |
3 | Medicine, General & Internal | 148 | 6% | 0% | 96 |
4 | Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging | 35 | 3% | 0% | 49 |
5 | Obstetrics & Gynecology | 8 | 2% | 0% | 24 |
6 | Public Administration | 0 | 0% | 0% | 2 |
7 | Primary Health Care | -0 | 0% | 0% | 1 |
8 | Emergency Medicine | -0 | 0% | 0% | 2 |
9 | Acoustics | -0 | 0% | 0% | 4 |
10 | Medical Informatics | -1 | 0% | 0% | 1 |
Address terms |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ABC HOSP | 39730 | 0% | 100% | 2 |
2 | CHIRURG VISCERALE URGENCE TRANSPLANTAT | 39730 | 0% | 100% | 2 |
3 | HEPATOBILIARY SURGTAIZHOU PEOPLES HOSP | 39730 | 0% | 100% | 2 |
4 | UPPER GI L AROSCOP UNIT | 39726 | 0% | 50% | 4 |
5 | 71 02 | 19865 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
6 | ABDOMINAL MED SURG | 19865 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
7 | ABT ALLGEMEINE GEFASS THORAX TRANSPLANTAT CHIRU | 19865 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
8 | ABT TRANSPLANTAT CHIRURG CHIRURG LEBER GALLENWE | 19865 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
9 | AFFILIATED GANQUAN HOSP | 19865 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
10 | ALMAAREF | 19865 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
Journals |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 66149 | 11% | 2% | 168 |
2 | SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 58609 | 3% | 6% | 50 |
3 | SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY | 12111 | 1% | 3% | 20 |
4 | BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 10011 | 5% | 1% | 73 |
5 | JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A | 9182 | 1% | 3% | 17 |
6 | GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY | 8904 | 4% | 1% | 59 |
7 | JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES | 7990 | 2% | 1% | 29 |
8 | SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES | 7378 | 2% | 1% | 29 |
9 | ENDOSCOPY | 5936 | 3% | 1% | 39 |
10 | WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 5294 | 3% | 1% | 47 |
Author Key Words |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DASARI, BVM , TAN, CJ , GURUSAMY, KS , MARTIN, DJ , KIRK, G , MCKIE, L , DIAMOND, T , TAYLOR, MA , (2013) SURGICAL VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF BILE DUCT STONES.COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS. VOL. . ISSUE 12. P. - | 94 | 78% | 0 |
2 | MARTIN, DJ , VERNON, DR , TOOULI, J , (2006) SURGICAL VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF BILE DUCT STONES.COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS. VOL. . ISSUE 2. P. - | 81 | 87% | 93 |
3 | ELGEIDIE, AA , (2014) SINGLE-SESSION MINIMALLY INVASIVE MANAGEMENT OF COMMON BILE DUCT STONES.WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY. VOL. 20. ISSUE 41. P. 15144 -15152 | 72 | 86% | 7 |
4 | DASARI, BVM , TAN, CJ , GURUSAMY, KS , MARTIN, DJ , KIRK, G , MCKIE, L , DIAMOND, T , TAYLOR, MA , (2013) SURGICAL VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF BILE DUCT STONES.COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS. VOL. . ISSUE 9. P. - | 86 | 77% | 1 |
5 | GURUSAMY, KS , GILJACA, V , TAKWOINGI, Y , HIGGIE, D , POROPAT, G , STIMAC, D , DAVIDSON, BR , (2015) ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY VERSUS INTRAOPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY FOR DIAGNOSIS OF COMMON BILE DUCT STONES.COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS. VOL. . ISSUE 2. P. - | 85 | 60% | 0 |
6 | SUN, SX , KULAYLAT, AN , HOLLENBEAK, CS , SOYBEL, DI , (2016) COST-EFFECTIVE DECISIONS IN DETECTING SILENT COMMON BILE DUCT GALLSTONES DURING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY.ANNALS OF SURGERY. VOL. 263. ISSUE 6. P. 1164 -1172 | 60 | 71% | 1 |
7 | PODDA, M , POLIGNANO, FM , LUHMANN, A , WILSON, MSJ , KULLI, C , TAIT, IS , (2016) SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS OF STUDIES COMPARING PRIMARY DUCT CLOSURE AND T-TUBE DRAINAGE AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC COMMON BILE DUCT EXPLORATION FOR CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS.SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES. VOL. 30. ISSUE 3. P. 845 -861 | 40 | 91% | 2 |
8 | GILJACA, V , GURUSAMY, KS , TAKWOINGI, Y , HIGGIE, D , POROPAT, G , STIMAC, D , DAVIDSON, BR , (2015) ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND VERSUS MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY FOR COMMON BILE DUCT STONES.COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS. VOL. . ISSUE 2. P. - | 83 | 50% | 1 |
9 | GURUSAMY, KS , GILJACA, V , TAKWOINGI, Y , HIGGIE, D , POROPAT, G , STIMAC, D , DAVIDSON, BR , (2015) ULTRASOUND VERSUS LIVER FUNCTION TESTS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF COMMON BILE DUCT STONES.COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS. VOL. . ISSUE 2. P. - | 72 | 55% | 3 |
10 | VINDAL, A , CHANDER, J , LAL, P , MAHENDRA, B , (2015) COMPARISON BETWEEN INTRAOPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY AND CHOLEDOCHOSCOPY FOR DUCTAL CLEARANCE IN LAPAROSCOPIC CBD EXPLORATION: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY.SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES. VOL. 29. ISSUE 5. P. 1030 -1038 | 43 | 90% | 3 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |