Class information for: |
Basic class information |
Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
---|---|---|---|
24441 | 311 | 46.7 | 22% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 | ECONOMICS//EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH//PSYCHOL | 3876184 |
106 | 3 | LAW//FORDHAM LAW REVIEW//BUSINESS LAWYER | 71924 |
1627 | 2 | LAW//URBAN LAWYER//JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES | 7008 |
24441 | 1 | LAND TRUSTS//CONSERVATION EASEMENTS//PRIVATE LAND CONSERVATION | 311 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | LAND TRUSTS | authKW | 1222208 | 6% | 66% | 19 |
2 | CONSERVATION EASEMENTS | authKW | 992831 | 10% | 34% | 30 |
3 | PRIVATE LAND CONSERVATION | authKW | 712610 | 5% | 48% | 15 |
4 | TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS | authKW | 314187 | 1% | 80% | 4 |
5 | TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS | authKW | 306821 | 2% | 63% | 5 |
6 | CONSERVATION COVENANTS | authKW | 261821 | 1% | 67% | 4 |
7 | CLUSTERED HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS | authKW | 196368 | 1% | 100% | 2 |
8 | TRADABLE PLANNING PERMITS | authKW | 196368 | 1% | 100% | 2 |
9 | LAND CONSERVATION | authKW | 159043 | 3% | 18% | 9 |
10 | LAND PRESERVATION | authKW | 120836 | 1% | 31% | 4 |
Web of Science journal categories |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Law | 10543 | 34% | 0% | 107 |
2 | Environmental Studies | 9031 | 31% | 0% | 95 |
3 | Urban Studies | 4128 | 13% | 0% | 39 |
4 | Planning & Development | 1258 | 9% | 0% | 27 |
5 | Geography | 1048 | 9% | 0% | 27 |
6 | Biodiversity Conservation | 1017 | 9% | 0% | 28 |
7 | Ecology | 435 | 14% | 0% | 44 |
8 | Economics | 162 | 9% | 0% | 27 |
9 | Environmental Sciences | 132 | 12% | 0% | 36 |
10 | Sociology | 92 | 4% | 0% | 11 |
Address terms |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | AMIDST AMSTERDAM METROPOLITAN DEV STUDIES | 98184 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
2 | CONG SIONAL SERVICE | 98184 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
3 | ECON CRAFTS SME | 98184 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
4 | INT ENVIRONM POLICY | 98184 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
5 | LAW HEAD TAX CLIN | 98184 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
6 | LEITERIN FOR UNGSEINHEIT WIRT AFTS SOZIAL W | 98184 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
7 | LEITERIN FOR UNGSGRUPPE LAND AFTSOKOL | 98184 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
8 | MARYLAND CH TER | 98184 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
9 | NACHHALTIGKEITSBEIRAT BADEN WURTTEMBERG | 98184 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
10 | NO AUSTRALIA ENVIRONM PROGRAM HUB | 98184 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
Journals |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NATURAL RESOURCES JOURNAL | 29867 | 5% | 2% | 17 |
2 | HARVARD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW | 20322 | 3% | 2% | 9 |
3 | REAL PROPERTY PROBATE AND TRUST JOURNAL | 14023 | 1% | 7% | 2 |
4 | LAND USE POLICY | 12181 | 5% | 1% | 17 |
5 | JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION | 9439 | 3% | 1% | 10 |
6 | DENVER UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | 5279 | 2% | 1% | 6 |
7 | LAND ECONOMICS | 5218 | 3% | 1% | 9 |
8 | NATURAL AREAS JOURNAL | 5176 | 2% | 1% | 7 |
9 | UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT LAW REVIEW | 4461 | 0% | 5% | 1 |
10 | REAL ESTATE LAW JOURNAL | 4267 | 0% | 4% | 1 |
Author Key Words |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | JAY, JE , (2012) WHEN PERPETUAL IS NOT FOREVER: THE CHALLENGE OF CHANGING CONDITIONS, AMENDMENT, AND TERMINATION OF PERPETUAL CONSERVATION EASEMENTS.HARVARD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW. VOL. 36. ISSUE 1. P. 1-78 | 12 | 92% | 4 |
2 | STROMAN, D , KREUTER, UP , (2016) LANDOWNER SATISFACTION WITH THE WETLAND RESERVE PROGRAM IN TEXAS: A MIXED-METHODS ANALYSIS.ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. VOL. 57. ISSUE 1. P. 97 -108 | 14 | 70% | 0 |
3 | STROMAN, DA , KREUTER, UP , (2014) PERPETUAL CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND LANDOWNERS: EVALUATING EASEMENT KNOWLEDGE, SATISFACTION AND PARTNER ORGANIZATION RELATIONSHIPS.JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. VOL. 146. ISSUE . P. 284 -291 | 15 | 63% | 3 |
4 | CHIODELLI, F , MORONI, S , (2016) ZONING-INTEGRATIVE AND ZONING-ALTERNATIVE TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS: COMPENSATION, EQUITY, EFFICIENCY.LAND USE POLICY. VOL. 52. ISSUE . P. 422 -429 | 15 | 52% | 1 |
5 | BRAY, Z , (2010) RECONCILING DEVELOPMENT AND NATURAL BEAUTY: THE PROMISE AND DILEMMA OF CONSERVATION EASEMENTS.HARVARD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW. VOL. 34. ISSUE 1. P. 119 -177 | 10 | 83% | 6 |
6 | OWLEY, J , (2015) CULTURAL HERITAGE CONSERVATION EASEMENTS: HERITAGE PROTECTION WITH PROPERTY LAW TOOLS.LAND USE POLICY. VOL. 49. ISSUE . P. 177 -182 | 8 | 80% | 1 |
7 | VEJCHODSKA, E , (2016) TRADABLE PLANNING PERMITS VERSUS AUCTIONED TRADABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS: DIFFERENT TRADING AGENTS, DIFFERENT POLICY OUTCOMES.JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT. VOL. 59. ISSUE 8. P. 1418 -1437 | 12 | 52% | 0 |
8 | OWLEY, J , RISSMAN, AR , (2016) TRENDS IN PRIVATE LAND CONSERVATION: INCREASING COMPLEXITY, SHIFTING CONSERVATION PURPOSES AND ALLOWABLE PRIVATE LAND USES.LAND USE POLICY. VOL. 51. ISSUE . P. 76 -84 | 10 | 63% | 0 |
9 | LINKOUS, ER , CHAPIN, TS , (2014) TDR PROGRAM PERFORMANCE IN FLORIDA.JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION. VOL. 80. ISSUE 3. P. 253 -267 | 7 | 88% | 0 |
10 | RISSMAN, AR , OWLEY, J , SHAW, MR , THOMPSON, B , (2015) ADAPTING CONSERVATION EASEMENTS TO CLIMATE CHANGE.CONSERVATION LETTERS. VOL. 8. ISSUE 1. P. 68 -76 | 12 | 44% | 2 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |