Class information for: |
Basic class information |
Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
---|---|---|---|
23756 | 335 | 48.9 | 16% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 | ECONOMICS//EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH//PSYCHOL | 3876184 |
106 | 3 | LAW//FORDHAM LAW REVIEW//BUSINESS LAWYER | 71924 |
3313 | 2 | FAMILY LAW QUARTERLY//LAW//UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE JOURNAL OF FAMILY LAW | 1823 |
23756 | 1 | CITIZEN REVIEW PANELS//FAMILY LAW QUARTERLY//TRAINING OURCE | 335 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CITIZEN REVIEW PANELS | authKW | 468768 | 2% | 86% | 6 |
2 | FAMILY LAW QUARTERLY | journal | 333015 | 15% | 7% | 49 |
3 | TRAINING OURCE | address | 208339 | 1% | 57% | 4 |
4 | INTERDISCIPLINARY FAMILY CHILD ADVOCACY | address | 182299 | 1% | 100% | 2 |
5 | CITIZEN REVIEW | authKW | 121532 | 1% | 67% | 2 |
6 | CHILDREN LAW | address | 117189 | 1% | 43% | 3 |
7 | ADOLESCENT FORENSIC EVALUATION | authKW | 91150 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
8 | ASSESSING CAUSES | authKW | 91150 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
9 | CHILD ADVOCACY LAW CLIN | address | 91150 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
10 | CHILD CUSTODY PRO BONO PROJECT | address | 91150 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
Web of Science journal categories |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Law | 45677 | 69% | 0% | 230 |
2 | Family Studies | 25462 | 33% | 0% | 112 |
3 | Social Work | 7404 | 18% | 0% | 60 |
4 | Social Issues | 272 | 3% | 0% | 10 |
5 | Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary | 222 | 4% | 0% | 15 |
6 | Psychology, Clinical | 25 | 2% | 0% | 8 |
7 | Psychology, Social | 18 | 1% | 0% | 5 |
8 | Psychology, Developmental | 16 | 1% | 0% | 5 |
9 | Education & Educational Research | 15 | 2% | 0% | 7 |
10 | Humanities, Multidisciplinary | 15 | 1% | 0% | 3 |
Address terms |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TRAINING OURCE | 208339 | 1% | 57% | 4 |
2 | INTERDISCIPLINARY FAMILY CHILD ADVOCACY | 182299 | 1% | 100% | 2 |
3 | CHILDREN LAW | 117189 | 1% | 43% | 3 |
4 | CHILD ADVOCACY LAW CLIN | 91150 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
5 | CHILD CUSTODY PRO BONO PROJECT | 91150 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
6 | CHILDREN PROJECT | 91150 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
7 | FAMILY LAW SOCIAL POLICY | 91150 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
8 | FAMILY LAW UNIT | 91150 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
9 | GRP HIST COMPARAT STUDIES EDUC | 91150 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
10 | INTERDISCIPLINARY LAW POLICY STUDIES | 91150 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
Journals |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | FAMILY LAW QUARTERLY | 333015 | 15% | 7% | 49 |
2 | FORDHAM LAW REVIEW | 39079 | 9% | 1% | 31 |
3 | CHILD WELFARE | 33533 | 7% | 2% | 23 |
4 | UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE JOURNAL OF FAMILY LAW | 16565 | 1% | 5% | 4 |
5 | COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF LAW AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS | 13841 | 2% | 2% | 8 |
6 | JOURNAL OF FAMILY LAW | 12248 | 1% | 3% | 4 |
7 | JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JOURNAL | 10484 | 1% | 3% | 4 |
8 | JUVENILE AND FAMILY COURT JOURNAL | 9069 | 1% | 2% | 5 |
9 | CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW | 8347 | 5% | 1% | 17 |
10 | UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW | 4459 | 2% | 1% | 6 |
Author Key Words |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DUQUETTE, DN , DARWALL, J , (2012) CHILD REPRESENTATION IN AMERICA: PROGRESS REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT CENTER.FAMILY LAW QUARTERLY. VOL. 46. ISSUE 1. P. 87-137 | 16 | 80% | 2 |
2 | ATWOOD, BA , (2008) THE UNIFORM REPRESENTATION OF CHILDREN IN ABUSE, NEGLECT, AND CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS ACT: BRIDGING THE DIVIDE BETWEEN PRAGMATISM AND IDEALISM.FAMILY LAW QUARTERLY. VOL. 42. ISSUE 1. P. 63-101 | 16 | 84% | 3 |
3 | HENNING, K , (2005) LOYALTY, PATERNALISM, AND RIGHTS: CLIENT COUNSELING THEORY AND THE ROLE OF CHILD'S COUNSEL IN DELINQUENCY CASES.NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW. VOL. 81. ISSUE 1. P. 245-324 | 21 | 55% | 13 |
4 | WU, CN , (1996) CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN THE REPRESENTATION OF CHILDREN IN DEPENDENCY CASES.FORDHAM LAW REVIEW. VOL. 64. ISSUE 4. P. 1857-1872 | 12 | 100% | 3 |
5 | HILL, FG , (1998) CLINICAL EDUCATION AND THE "BEST INTEREST" REPRESENTATION OF CHILDREN IN CUSTODY DISPUTES: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN LAWYERING AND PEDAGOGY.INDIANA LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 73. ISSUE 2. P. 605-633 | 11 | 92% | 3 |
6 | MARKOWITZ, M , (2003) IS A LAWYER WHO REPRESENTS THE "BEST INTERESTS" REALLY THE BEST FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S CHILDREN?.UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW. VOL. 64. ISSUE 3. P. 615-638 | 8 | 100% | 1 |
7 | CHERRY, J , (1999) THE CHILD AS APPRENTICE: ENHANCING THE CHILD'S ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN CUSTODY DECISIONMAKING BY PROVIDING SCAFFOLDED INSTRUCTION.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW. VOL. 72. ISSUE 2-3. P. 811 -850 | 13 | 68% | 3 |
8 | KEARNS, B , (2002) A WARM HEART BUT A COOL HEAD: WHY A DUAL GUARDIAN AD LITEM SYSTEM BEST PROTECTS FAMILIES INVOLVED IN ABUSED AND NEGLECTED PROCEEDINGS.WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW. VOL. . ISSUE 3. P. 699-733 | 8 | 100% | 1 |
9 | APPELL, AR , (1996) DECONTEXTUALIZING THE CHILD CLIENT: THE EFFICACY OF THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT MODEL FOR VERY YOUNG CHILDREN.FORDHAM LAW REVIEW. VOL. 64. ISSUE 4. P. 1955-1973 | 12 | 80% | 8 |
10 | MANGOLD, SV , (1999) CHALLENGING THE PARENT-CHILD-STATE TRIANGLE IN PUBLIC FAMILY LAW: THE IMPORTANCE OF PRIVATE PROVIDERS IN THE DEPENDENCY SYSTEM.BUFFALO LAW REVIEW. VOL. 47. ISSUE 3. P. 1397 -1456 | 11 | 79% | 3 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |