Class information for: |
Basic class information |
Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
---|---|---|---|
23543 | 342 | 44.8 | 38% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
---|---|---|---|
3 | 4 | PLANT SCIENCES//AGRONOMY//FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY | 1882812 |
15 | 3 | ECOLOGY//FORESTRY//BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION | 124126 |
787 | 2 | SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS//BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION//CONSERVATION PLANNING | 12139 |
23543 | 1 | ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT//RECOVERY PLANS//HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANS | 342 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT | authKW | 1117833 | 13% | 27% | 46 |
2 | RECOVERY PLANS | authKW | 654720 | 6% | 33% | 22 |
3 | HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANS | authKW | 525192 | 3% | 59% | 10 |
4 | VALLEY ELDERBERRY LONGHORN BEETLE | authKW | 238088 | 1% | 67% | 4 |
5 | CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION | authKW | 178568 | 1% | 100% | 2 |
6 | FOREST PRACTICES RULES | authKW | 178568 | 1% | 100% | 2 |
7 | PACIFIC ENVIRONM ADVOCACY | address | 178568 | 1% | 100% | 2 |
8 | PRIORITY RANK | authKW | 178568 | 1% | 100% | 2 |
9 | RECOVERY EXPENDITURES | authKW | 178568 | 1% | 100% | 2 |
10 | SINGLE SPECIES PLANS | authKW | 178568 | 1% | 100% | 2 |
Web of Science journal categories |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Biodiversity Conservation | 7218 | 23% | 0% | 77 |
2 | Law | 3815 | 20% | 0% | 68 |
3 | Environmental Studies | 3562 | 18% | 0% | 63 |
4 | Ecology | 3000 | 34% | 0% | 115 |
5 | Environmental Sciences | 1919 | 37% | 0% | 125 |
6 | Biology | 265 | 8% | 0% | 29 |
7 | Economics | 131 | 8% | 0% | 26 |
8 | Fisheries | 90 | 4% | 0% | 12 |
9 | Agricultural Economics & Policy | 85 | 1% | 0% | 4 |
10 | Public Administration | 55 | 1% | 0% | 5 |
Address terms |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PACIFIC ENVIRONM ADVOCACY | 178568 | 1% | 100% | 2 |
2 | SOCIAL SCI HUMANITIES 2116 | 178568 | 1% | 100% | 2 |
3 | AUSABLE ENVIRONM STUDIES REP ENTAT | 89284 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
4 | AUTONOMOUS ORG PK | 89284 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
5 | BIO ERS OUTCOMES | 89284 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
6 | CANADA CHAIR MARINE CONSERVAT BIO ERS | 89284 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
7 | CANADA CHAIR OCEAN LAW GOVERNANCE | 89284 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
8 | CONSERVAT STRATEGY PERFORMANCE UNIT | 89284 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
9 | CONSULTING PUBL INTE T | 89284 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
10 | COWAN TETR OD ECT | 89284 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
Journals |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CONSERVATION BIOLOGY | 43640 | 13% | 1% | 44 |
2 | ECOLOGY LAW QUARTERLY | 35459 | 5% | 2% | 17 |
3 | BIOSCIENCE | 23067 | 7% | 1% | 25 |
4 | NATURAL RESOURCES JOURNAL | 11362 | 3% | 1% | 11 |
5 | HARVARD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW | 11175 | 2% | 2% | 7 |
6 | ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT | 9300 | 6% | 0% | 21 |
7 | ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS | 6795 | 1% | 2% | 4 |
8 | CONSERVATION LETTERS | 5488 | 1% | 1% | 5 |
9 | JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW | 5323 | 1% | 1% | 4 |
10 | ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS | 4547 | 4% | 0% | 14 |
Author Key Words |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | SCHWARTZ, MW , (2008) THE PERFORMANCE OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT.ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS. VOL. 39. ISSUE . P. 279-299 | 41 | 59% | 36 |
2 | PUCKETT, EE , KESLER, DC , GREENWALD, DN , (2016) TAXA, PETITIONING AGENCY, AND LAWSUITS AFFECT TIME SPENT AWAITING LISTING UNDER THE US ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT.BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION. VOL. 201. ISSUE . P. 220 -229 | 21 | 81% | 0 |
3 | CLARK, JA , HOEKSTRA, JM , BOERSMA, PD , KAREIVA, P , (2002) IMPROVING U.S. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT RECOVERY PLANS: KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SCB RECOVERY PLAN PROJECT.CONSERVATION BIOLOGY. VOL. 16. ISSUE 6. P. 1510-1519 | 22 | 92% | 65 |
4 | TROYER, CM , GERBER, LR , (2015) ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF THE US ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT RECOVERY PLANNING GUIDELINES ON MANAGING THREATS FOR LISTED SPECIES.CONSERVATION BIOLOGY. VOL. 29. ISSUE 5. P. 1423 -1433 | 21 | 66% | 0 |
5 | HUTCHINGS, JA , STEPHENS, T , VANDERZWAAG, DL , (2016) MARINE SPECIES AT RISK PROTECTION IN AUSTRALIA AND CANADA: PAPER PROMISES, PALTRY PROGRESSIONS.OCEAN DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNATIONAL LAW. VOL. 47. ISSUE 3. P. 233 -254 | 14 | 82% | 0 |
6 | TAYLOR, MFJ , SUCKLING, KF , RACHLINSKI, JJ , (2005) THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS.BIOSCIENCE. VOL. 55. ISSUE 4. P. 360-367 | 16 | 84% | 62 |
7 | DOAK, DF , BOOR, GKH , BAKKER, VJ , MORRIS, WF , LOUTHAN, A , MORRISON, SA , STANLEY, A , CROWDER, LB , (2015) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING RECOVERY CRITERIA UNDER THE US ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT.BIOSCIENCE. VOL. 65. ISSUE 2. P. 189 -199 | 17 | 61% | 2 |
8 | CROUSE, DT , MEHRHOFF, LA , PARKIN, MJ , ELAM, DR , CHEN, LY , (2002) ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY AND THE SCB STUDY: A US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE PERSPECTIVE.ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS. VOL. 12. ISSUE 3. P. 719-723 | 13 | 100% | 13 |
9 | ORTEGA-ARGUETA, A , BAXTER, G , HOCKINGS, M , (2011) COMPLIANCE OF AUSTRALIAN THREATENED SPECIES RECOVERY PLANS WITH LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS.JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. VOL. 92. ISSUE 8. P. 2054 -2060 | 15 | 68% | 3 |
10 | OLIVE, A , (2014) THE ROAD TO RECOVERY: COMPARING CANADA AND US RECOVERY STRATEGIES FOR SHARED ENDANGERED SPECIES.CANADIAN GEOGRAPHER-GEOGRAPHE CANADIEN. VOL. 58. ISSUE 3. P. 263 -275 | 12 | 80% | 0 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |