Class information for:
Level 1: FOLSOM//LITHIC TECHNOLOGY//PALEOINDIAN

Basic class information

ID Publications Average number
of references
Avg. shr. active
ref. in WoS
5394 1563 59.9 22%



Bar chart of Publication_year

Last years might be incomplete

Classes in level above (level 2)



ID, lev.
above
Publications Label for level above
208 20278 ARCHAEOLOGY//AMERICAN ANTIQUITY//ANTHROPOLOGY

Terms with highest relevance score



Rank Term Type of term Relevance score
(tfidf)
Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences
Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term
Num. of
publ. in
class
1 FOLSOM Author keyword 51 83% 2% 29
2 LITHIC TECHNOLOGY Author keyword 48 41% 6% 92
3 PALEOINDIAN Author keyword 45 56% 4% 55
4 PLAINS ANTHROPOLOGIST Journal 38 23% 9% 147
5 CLOVIS Author keyword 35 64% 2% 35
6 AMERICAN ANTIQUITY Journal 32 14% 14% 212
7 TECHNOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION Author keyword 24 82% 1% 14
8 FLINTKNAPPING Author keyword 24 91% 1% 10
9 LITHICS Author keyword 24 39% 3% 48
10 USE WEAR Author keyword 18 47% 2% 28

Web of Science journal categories

Author Key Words



Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)
Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences
Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term
Num. of
publ. in
class
LCSH search Wikipedia search
1 FOLSOM 51 83% 2% 29 Search FOLSOM Search FOLSOM
2 LITHIC TECHNOLOGY 48 41% 6% 92 Search LITHIC+TECHNOLOGY Search LITHIC+TECHNOLOGY
3 PALEOINDIAN 45 56% 4% 55 Search PALEOINDIAN Search PALEOINDIAN
4 CLOVIS 35 64% 2% 35 Search CLOVIS Search CLOVIS
5 TECHNOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION 24 82% 1% 14 Search TECHNOLOGICAL+ORGANIZATION Search TECHNOLOGICAL+ORGANIZATION
6 FLINTKNAPPING 24 91% 1% 10 Search FLINTKNAPPING Search FLINTKNAPPING
7 LITHICS 24 39% 3% 48 Search LITHICS Search LITHICS
8 USE WEAR 18 47% 2% 28 Search USE+WEAR Search USE+WEAR
9 LITHIC RAW MATERIAL 15 88% 0% 7 Search LITHIC+RAW+MATERIAL Search LITHIC+RAW+MATERIAL
10 PROJECTILE POINTS 15 73% 1% 11 Search PROJECTILE+POINTS Search PROJECTILE+POINTS

Key Words Plus



Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)
Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences
Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term
Num. of
publ. in
class
1 FOLSOM 72 93% 2% 27
2 UBM LASER PROFILOMETRY 45 94% 1% 16
3 SCRAPER MORPHOLOGY 41 90% 1% 18
4 TECHNOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION 33 77% 1% 23
5 ARCHAEOLOGICAL VERIFICATION 30 100% 1% 12
6 GEOMETRIC INDEX 27 92% 1% 11
7 HANDAXES 27 76% 1% 19
8 UNIFACIAL STONE TOOLS 26 100% 1% 11
9 CLOVIS 24 47% 2% 37
10 USE LIFE 23 100% 1% 10

Journals



Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)
Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences
Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term
Num. of
publ. in
class
1 PLAINS ANTHROPOLOGIST 38 23% 9% 147
2 AMERICAN ANTIQUITY 32 14% 14% 212
3 NORTH AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGIST 16 24% 4% 59
4 INTERSECCIONES EN ANTROPOLOGIA 4 14% 2% 24
5 JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL METHOD AND THEORY 3 10% 2% 29
6 AUSTRALIAN ARCHAEOLOGY 2 11% 1% 17

Reviews



Title Publ. year Cit. Active references % act. ref.
to same field
The Analysis of Stone Tool Procurement, Production, and Maintenance 2009 44 135 76%
Projectile points, people, and Plains Paleoindian perambulations 2009 20 39 92%
CLOVIS AND WESTERN STEMMED: POPULATION MIGRATION AND THE MEETING OF TWO TECHNOLOGIES IN THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST 2010 32 26 54%
The Late Pleistocene dispersal of modern humans in the Americas 2008 206 40 18%
Getting to the point: Evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry 1998 76 20 65%
Raw material quality and Oldowan hominin toolstone preferences: evidence from Kanjera South, Kenya 2009 23 53 58%
Acheulian Giant-Core Technology A Worldwide Perspective 2009 38 33 36%
High-tech foragers? Folsom and later Paleoindian technology on the Great Plains 2002 38 18 100%
The Chaine Operatoire Approach in Middle Paleolithic Archaeology 2009 32 28 39%
Lithic source use and paleoarchaic foraging territories in the Great Basin 2003 54 35 60%

Address terms



Rank Address term Relevance score
(tfidf)
Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences
Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term
Num. of
publ. in
class
1 GREAT BASIN PALEOINDIAN UNIT 14 100% 0.4% 7
2 BIG BEND STUDIES 6 100% 0.3% 4
3 SUR E METROL ARCHAEOL TECHNOL PROJECT 6 100% 0.3% 4
4 STUDY AMER 1 5 38% 0.7% 11
5 CLASS STUDIES ANTHROPOL ARCHAEOL 3 57% 0.3% 4
6 STUDY FIRST AMER 3 57% 0.3% 4
7 MULTIDISCIPLINARIO HIST CIENCIAS HUMANAS C 3 100% 0.2% 3
8 LEMELSON 3 60% 0.2% 3
9 ANTHROPOL CLASS STUDIES 2 44% 0.3% 4
10 DIPARTIMENTO STORIA ARCHEOL GEOG ARTE SPETTACOL 2 67% 0.1% 2

Related classes at same level (level 1)



Rank Relatedness score Related classes
1 0.0000233296 CIENCIAS NAT ARQUEOL//NEW WORLD COLONIZATION//FIRST AMERICANS
2 0.0000205644 MIDDLE STONE AGE//HOWIESONS POORT//AURIGNACIAN
3 0.0000174115 OBSIDIAN//OBSIDIAN SOURCING//OBSIDIAN PROVENANCE
4 0.0000168353 TAPHONOMY//ZOOARCHAEOLOGY//CUT MARKS
5 0.0000147745 MEGAFAUNA//MAT CULTURE HIST//PLEISTOCENE EXTINCTIONS
6 0.0000141542 MUSEUM NAT CULTURAL HIST//RESOURCE DEPRESSION//JOURNAL OF ISLAND & COASTAL ARCHAEOLOGY
7 0.0000136532 PLAINS ANTHROPOLOGIST//ONEOTA//AMERICAN ANTIQUITY
8 0.0000121767 ANCIENT HIST CULTURE ARCHAEOL//YOUNGEST TOBA TUFF//TOBA TUFFS
9 0.0000119243 ANCIENT PROTEINS//HAEMOTAPHONOMY//BLOOD RESIDUE ANALYSIS
10 0.0000113417 AMERICAN ANTIQUITY//CHACO CANYON//CULTURAL OURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM