Class information for:
Level 1: ELECTRONIC DATA CAPTURE//PATIENT CENTRED ASSESSMENT//EPRO

Basic class information
ID Publications Average number
of references		 Avg. shr. active
ref. in WoS
16507 585 31.1 66%


Bar chart of Publication_year

Last years might be incomplete

Classes in level above (level 2)


ID, lev.
above		 Publications Label for level above
205 20360 PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY//QUALITY OF LIFE//QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH

Terms with highest relevance score


Rank Term Type of term Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 ELECTRONIC DATA CAPTURE Author keyword 4 22% 3% 17
2 PATIENT CENTRED ASSESSMENT Author keyword 3 100% 1% 3
3 EPRO Author keyword 3 60% 1% 3
4 PSYCHOSOCIAL CLIN PRACTICE GRP Address 3 42% 1% 5
5 PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME CONSORTIUM Address 2 44% 1% 4
6 ELECTRONIC PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES Author keyword 2 67% 0% 2
7 INDIVIDUAL PATIENT APPLICATIONS Author keyword 2 67% 0% 2
8 OFF PHYS CHIEF Address 2 67% 0% 2
9 PRO CTCAE Author keyword 2 67% 0% 2
10 PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOL CLIN PRACTICE GRP Address 2 29% 1% 6

Web of Science journal categories

Author Key Words


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class		 LCSH search Wikipedia search
1 ELECTRONIC DATA CAPTURE 4 22% 3% 17 Search ELECTRONIC+DATA+CAPTURE Search ELECTRONIC+DATA+CAPTURE
2 PATIENT CENTRED ASSESSMENT 3 100% 1% 3 Search PATIENT+CENTRED+ASSESSMENT Search PATIENT+CENTRED+ASSESSMENT
3 EPRO 3 60% 1% 3 Search EPRO Search EPRO
4 ELECTRONIC PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES 2 67% 0% 2 Search ELECTRONIC+PATIENT+REPORTED+OUTCOMES Search ELECTRONIC+PATIENT+REPORTED+OUTCOMES
5 INDIVIDUAL PATIENT APPLICATIONS 2 67% 0% 2 Search INDIVIDUAL+PATIENT+APPLICATIONS Search INDIVIDUAL+PATIENT+APPLICATIONS
6 PRO CTCAE 2 67% 0% 2 Search PRO+CTCAE Search PRO+CTCAE
7 SOCIAL DIFFICULTIES 2 26% 1% 5 Search SOCIAL+DIFFICULTIES Search SOCIAL+DIFFICULTIES
8 ELECTRONIC DATA CAPTURING EDC 1 100% 0% 2 Search ELECTRONIC+DATA+CAPTURING+EDC Search ELECTRONIC+DATA+CAPTURING+EDC
9 ELECTRONIC PATIENT DIARY 1 100% 0% 2 Search ELECTRONIC+PATIENT+DIARY Search ELECTRONIC+PATIENT+DIARY
10 EPAQ PF 1 100% 0% 2 Search EPAQ+PF Search EPAQ+PF

Key Words Plus


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 ONCOLOGY PRACTICE 27 46% 8% 44
2 CHEMOTHERAPY RELATED TOXICITY 7 57% 1% 8
3 CANCER CARE MONITOR 6 71% 1% 5
4 ELECTRONIC VERSION 6 43% 2% 10
5 PATIENTVIEWPOINT 6 100% 1% 4
6 TOUCH SCREEN VERSION 5 54% 1% 7
7 MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ASYMSC 4 75% 1% 3
8 PATIENT REPORTED DATA 3 100% 1% 3
9 PAPER QUESTIONNAIRES 3 50% 1% 4
10 TELEHEALTH PROGRAM 3 50% 1% 4

Journals

Reviews


Title Publ. year Cit. Active
references		 % act. ref.
to same field
What Is the Value of the Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Toward Improvement of Patient Outcomes, Processes of Care, and Health Service Outcomes in Cancer Care? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials 2014 11 36 58%
Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations 2012 50 56 46%
A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting 2013 15 52 58%
Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A meta-analytic review 2008 121 60 50%
The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research 2014 8 29 34%
Capture, Transfer, and Feedback of Patient-Centered Outcomes Data in Palliative Care Populations: Does It Make a Difference? A Systematic Review 2015 1 43 40%
New Frontiers in Patient-Reported Outcomes: Adverse Event Reporting, Comparative Effectiveness, and Quality Assessment 2014 4 17 47%
Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review 2013 9 34 50%
Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review 2006 113 47 34%
Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data 2007 60 20 50%

Address terms


Rank Address term Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ.
in class
1 PSYCHOSOCIAL CLIN PRACTICE GRP 3 42% 0.9% 5
2 PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME CONSORTIUM 2 44% 0.7% 4
3 OFF PHYS CHIEF 2 67% 0.3% 2
4 PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOL CLIN PRACTICE GRP 2 29% 1.0% 6
5 LEEDS CITY COUNCIL SOCIAL SERV 1 100% 0.3% 2
6 MAGUIRE COMMUN SKILLS TRAINING UNIT 1 40% 0.3% 2
7 TELEHEALTH TECHNOL 1 40% 0.3% 2
8 CLIN LEEDS 1 21% 0.5% 3
9 DUKE CANC CARE PROGRAM 1 21% 0.5% 3
10 SOCIAL CULTURAL POLICY 1 21% 0.5% 3

Related classes at same level (level 1)


Rank Relatedness score Related classes
1 0.0000263195 EORTC QLQ C30//QUAL LIFE UNIT//FACT G
2 0.0000154861 PROMIS//ITEM BANK//MED SOCIAL SCI
3 0.0000090462 RESPONSE SHIFT//INDIVIDUAL QUALITY OF LIFE//PATIENT GENERATED INDEX
4 0.0000090032 PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY//DISTRESS THERMOMETER//PSYCHO ONCOLOGY
5 0.0000089559 PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT//MEDICAL APP//HANDHELD COMPUTERS
6 0.0000088313 AUDIT SYSTEMS//COMPUTERIZED QUALITY CONTROL//MED HIST TAKING
7 0.0000087918 MED INFORMAT SYST UNIT//INTERACTIVE VOICE RESPONSE//REVISIT INTERVAL
8 0.0000082526 AFFECTIVE FORECASTING//IMPACT BIAS//EMPATHY GAPS
9 0.0000079803 ROLAND MORRIS DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE//RESPONSIVENESS//MINIMUM CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE
10 0.0000076556 WEB SURVEYS//WEB SURVEY//ONLINE PANEL