Class information for:
Level 1: MESSAGE FRAMING//FRAMING EFFECT//ATTRIBUTE FRAMING

Basic class information
ID Publications Average number
of references		 Avg. shr. active
ref. in WoS
16000 612 35.1 59%


Bar chart of Publication_year

Last years might be incomplete

Classes in level above (level 2)


ID, lev.
above		 Publications Label for level above
84 26100 ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES//JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING//JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY

Terms with highest relevance score


Rank Term Type of term Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 MESSAGE FRAMING Author keyword 58 56% 12% 71
2 FRAMING EFFECT Author keyword 18 34% 7% 43
3 ATTRIBUTE FRAMING Author keyword 8 60% 1% 9
4 FRAMING EFFECTS Author keyword 5 19% 4% 25
5 SELF FRAMING Author keyword 4 75% 0% 3
6 PREVENT SURVEILLANCE SECT Address 3 100% 0% 3
7 MESSAGE FRAME Author keyword 2 44% 1% 4
8 ARGUMENTATIVE ORIENTATION Author keyword 2 67% 0% 2
9 ASIAN DISEASE PROBLEM Author keyword 2 67% 0% 2
10 DETECTION BEHAVIOUR Author keyword 2 67% 0% 2

Web of Science journal categories

Author Key Words


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class		 LCSH search Wikipedia search
1 MESSAGE FRAMING 58 56% 12% 71 Search MESSAGE+FRAMING Search MESSAGE+FRAMING
2 FRAMING EFFECT 18 34% 7% 43 Search FRAMING+EFFECT Search FRAMING+EFFECT
3 ATTRIBUTE FRAMING 8 60% 1% 9 Search ATTRIBUTE+FRAMING Search ATTRIBUTE+FRAMING
4 FRAMING EFFECTS 5 19% 4% 25 Search FRAMING+EFFECTS Search FRAMING+EFFECTS
5 SELF FRAMING 4 75% 0% 3 Search SELF+FRAMING Search SELF+FRAMING
6 MESSAGE FRAME 2 44% 1% 4 Search MESSAGE+FRAME Search MESSAGE+FRAME
7 ARGUMENTATIVE ORIENTATION 2 67% 0% 2 Search ARGUMENTATIVE+ORIENTATION Search ARGUMENTATIVE+ORIENTATION
8 ASIAN DISEASE PROBLEM 2 67% 0% 2 Search ASIAN+DISEASE+PROBLEM Search ASIAN+DISEASE+PROBLEM
9 DETECTION BEHAVIOUR 2 67% 0% 2 Search DETECTION+BEHAVIOUR Search DETECTION+BEHAVIOUR
10 INFORMATION FRAMING 2 50% 0% 3 Search INFORMATION+FRAMING Search INFORMATION+FRAMING

Key Words Plus


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 LOSS FRAMED MESSAGES 45 64% 7% 44
2 RELATIVE PERSUASIVENESS 40 79% 4% 26
3 HEALTHY BEHAVIOR 32 68% 5% 28
4 FRAMED MESSAGES 12 48% 3% 19
5 GAIN FRAMED MESSAGES 11 100% 1% 6
6 ISSUE INVOLVEMENT 6 26% 3% 21
7 FRAMED HEALTH MESSAGES 6 100% 1% 4
8 PERFORM 5 22% 3% 19
9 RISKY DECISIONS 5 37% 2% 10
10 RISKY CHOICE 3 13% 4% 23

Journals

Reviews


Title Publ. year Cit. Active references % act. ref.
to same field
"Quitting Smoking Will Benefit Your Health": The Evolution of Clinician Messaging to Encourage Tobacco Cessation 2014 4 29 62%
The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review 2007 117 50 62%
Framing of health information messages 2011 13 92 62%
Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing 1997 538 79 47%
The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain- and Loss-Framed Messages for Promoting Vaccination: A Meta-Analytic Review 2012 7 24 75%
All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects 1998 510 95 51%
Individual differences in adult decision-making competence 2007 106 65 28%
Gain-Framed Messages Do Not Motivate Sun Protection: A Meta-Analytic Review of Randomized Trials Comparing Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Appeals for Promoting Skin Cancer Prevention 2012 3 20 65%
When do gain-framed health messages work better than fear appeals? 2015 0 30 83%
The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis 1998 304 128 41%

Address terms


Rank Address term Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ.
in class
1 PREVENT SURVEILLANCE SECT 3 100% 0.5% 3
2 OFFICERS 1 33% 0.3% 2
3 CHAIR ERGON 1 50% 0.2% 1
4 INT EXCHANGE COOPERAT 1 50% 0.2% 1
5 PSYCHIAT WOMENS HLTH YALE 1 50% 0.2% 1
6 STRATEG DECIS 1 50% 0.2% 1
7 CMHC PSYCHIAT 0 33% 0.2% 1
8 CT BAUER BUSINESS ADM 0 33% 0.2% 1
9 HGEBIET AGRAR LEBENSMITTELMKT 0 33% 0.2% 1
10 INTERDISCIPLINARY GRP ENVIRONM STUDIES 0 33% 0.2% 1

Related classes at same level (level 1)


Rank Relatedness score Related classes
1 0.0000202233 REGULATORY FOCUS//REGULATORY FIT//PREVENTION FOCUS
2 0.0000187362 SELF AFFIRMATION//DEFENSIVE PROCESSING//FEAR APPEALS
3 0.0000172496 NUMERACY//RISK COMMUNICATION//RISK LITERACY
4 0.0000138435 ENDOWMENT EFFECT//WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT//WTA WTP DISPARITY
5 0.0000135400 ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT//SUNK COST//SUNK COST EFFECT
6 0.0000129032 ATTRACTION EFFECT//CHOICE OVERLOAD//COMPROMISE EFFECT
7 0.0000117613 PRICE MATCHING GUARANTEES//REFERENCE PRICE//REFERENCE PRICES
8 0.0000116401 VERBAL PROBABILITIES//VERBAL PROBABILITY//SUPPORT THEORY
9 0.0000091392 IDENTIFIABLE VICTIM EFFECT//DONATION DECISIONS//IDENTIFIABLE VICTIMS
10 0.0000090216 HEALTH WARNINGS//PLAIN PACKAGING//BEHAV CANC