Class information for:
Level 1: APPROPRIATENESS OF CARE//APPROPRIATENESS//EXPERT PANELS

Basic class information
ID Publications Average number
of references		 Avg. shr. active
ref. in WoS
15100 662 26.1 68%


Bar chart of Publication_year

Last years might be incomplete

Classes in level above (level 2)


ID, lev.
above		 Publications Label for level above
311 17667 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES//HEALTH AFFAIRS//INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING

Terms with highest relevance score


Rank Term Type of term Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 APPROPRIATENESS OF CARE Author keyword 10 52% 2% 13
2 APPROPRIATENESS Author keyword 5 11% 7% 46
3 EXPERT PANELS Author keyword 2 36% 1% 5
4 1700 MAIN ST Address 2 67% 0% 2
5 GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY SERV Address 2 67% 0% 2
6 UNIDAD INVEST SERV SALUD Address 2 50% 0% 3
7 APPROPRIATENESS RATINGS Author keyword 1 50% 0% 2
8 CONSENSUS PANELS Author keyword 1 50% 0% 2
9 EPAGE II Author keyword 1 100% 0% 2
10 EUROPEAN PANEL ON THE APPROPRIATENESS OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY Author keyword 1 100% 0% 2

Web of Science journal categories

Author Key Words


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class		 LCSH search Wikipedia search
1 APPROPRIATENESS OF CARE 10 52% 2% 13 Search APPROPRIATENESS+OF+CARE Search APPROPRIATENESS+OF+CARE
2 APPROPRIATENESS 5 11% 7% 46 Search APPROPRIATENESS Search APPROPRIATENESS
3 EXPERT PANELS 2 36% 1% 5 Search EXPERT+PANELS Search EXPERT+PANELS
4 APPROPRIATENESS RATINGS 1 50% 0% 2 Search APPROPRIATENESS+RATINGS Search APPROPRIATENESS+RATINGS
5 CONSENSUS PANELS 1 50% 0% 2 Search CONSENSUS+PANELS Search CONSENSUS+PANELS
6 EPAGE II 1 100% 0% 2 Search EPAGE+II Search EPAGE+II
7 EUROPEAN PANEL ON THE APPROPRIATENESS OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 1 100% 0% 2 Search EUROPEAN+PANEL+ON+THE+APPROPRIATENESS+OF+GASTROINTESTINAL+ENDOSCOPY Search EUROPEAN+PANEL+ON+THE+APPROPRIATENESS+OF+GASTROINTESTINAL+ENDOSCOPY
8 PATIENT TRANSFER COMMUNICATION MEASURES 1 100% 0% 2 Search PATIENT+TRANSFER+COMMUNICATION+MEASURES Search PATIENT+TRANSFER+COMMUNICATION+MEASURES
9 RURAL HOSPITAL QUALITY 1 100% 0% 2 Search RURAL+HOSPITAL+QUALITY Search RURAL+HOSPITAL+QUALITY
10 RAND METHOD 1 33% 0% 3 Search RAND+METHOD Search RAND+METHOD

Key Words Plus


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 ASGE GUIDELINES 24 82% 2% 14
2 PHYSICIAN RATINGS 19 63% 3% 19
3 GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY EPAGE 12 75% 1% 9
4 OPEN ACCESS ENDOSCOPY 8 36% 3% 19
5 EUROPEAN PANEL 7 37% 2% 15
6 EPAGE 6 71% 1% 5
7 OPEN ACCESS SYSTEM 6 100% 1% 4
8 CARDIAC PROCEDURES 5 16% 4% 28
9 CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION FACILITIES 4 38% 1% 9
10 UNDERUSE 4 16% 3% 22

Journals

Reviews


Title Publ. year Cit. Active
references		 % act. ref.
to same field
The appropriateness method has acceptable reliability and validity for assessing overuse and underuse of surgical procedures 2012 11 46 70%
Appropriateness Criteria to Assess Variations in Surgical Procedure Use in the United States 2011 13 48 58%
A systematic review of studies comparing myocardial infarction mortality for generalists and specialists: Lessons for research and health policy 2006 11 21 57%
A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries 2014 12 64 17%
Appropriateness of the Indication for Colonoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 2011 3 22 45%
Review of the utilization of the RAND appropriateness method in the biomedical literature (1999-2004) 2009 4 35 49%
A comparison of outcomes resulting from generalist vs specialist care for a single discrete medical condition - A systematic review and methodologic critique 2007 50 81 15%
Gastrointestinal endoscopy: Do we perform too many or not enough procedures? 1999 1 5 80%
UNIVERSAL HEALTH-CARE AND HIGH-TECH MEDICINE 1995 2 3 100%
What are appropriate rates of invasive procedures following acute myocardial infarction? A systematic review 2001 6 30 57%

Address terms


Rank Address term Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ.
in class
1 1700 MAIN ST 2 67% 0.3% 2
2 GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY SERV 2 67% 0.3% 2
3 UNIDAD INVEST SERV SALUD 2 50% 0.5% 3
4 STATEWIDE HLTH SERV 1 100% 0.3% 2
5 SUBDIRECC GEN EPIDEMIOL INFORMAC SANITARIA 1 50% 0.3% 2
6 CARDIOL HLTH SERV 1 33% 0.5% 3
7 CARDIAC DIRECTORATE 1 27% 0.5% 3
8 HLTH CARE EVALUAT UNIT 1 11% 1.1% 7
9 ABS PENEDES RURAL 1 50% 0.2% 1
10 BARMHERZIGEN WESTERN HEILIGEN KREUZ WELS 1 50% 0.2% 1

Related classes at same level (level 1)


Rank Relatedness score Related classes
1 0.0000188734 WAITING LISTS//WAITING TIMES//ALLIED HLTH OFF
2 0.0000181093 AMBULATORY CARE SENSITIVE CONDITIONS//PREVENTABLE HOSPITALIZATIONS//PREVENTABLE HOSPITALIZATION
3 0.0000129627 SURGICAL BACKUP//CARDIOVASC SURG PHYSIOL S//BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
4 0.0000128521 QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATIONS//DANSE MACABRE//LETTERKUNDE
5 0.0000120362 NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME//TERRENCE DONNELLY HEART//CANADIAN HEART
6 0.0000104687 DIPARTIMENTO MED CLIN PREVENT//INDICATORS OF ILL HEALTH//ALGORITHMS OF TREATMENT
7 0.0000101950 CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES//AGREE INSTRUMENT//QUALITY OF EVIDENCE
8 0.0000095507 APPROPRIATE USE CRITERIA//ACCF APPROPRIATE USE CRITERIA//APPROPRIATE UTILIZATION
9 0.0000085037 RACE CONCORDANCE//EAST CAROLINA HEART//HEALTHCARE EQU
10 0.0000078842 RATE OF DEATH//PROGRAM HEPATOL//HEPATOLOGIST