Class information for:
Level 1: CONSORT//OTTAWA METHODS//REPORTING QUALITY

Basic class information
ID Publications Average number
of references		 Avg. shr. active
ref. in WoS
1478 2547 31.9 67%


Bar chart of Publication_year

Last years might be incomplete

Classes in level above (level 2)


ID, lev.
above		 Publications Label for level above
917 10527 EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE//BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION//PUBLICATION BIAS

Terms with highest relevance score


Rank Term Type of term Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 CONSORT Author keyword 35 46% 2% 56
2 OTTAWA METHODS Address 32 69% 1% 27
3 REPORTING QUALITY Author keyword 32 63% 1% 32
4 CONSORT STATEMENT Author keyword 26 57% 1% 31
5 SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS Author keyword 16 15% 4% 99
6 STAT MED Address 16 15% 4% 101
7 QUALITY OF REPORTING Author keyword 14 51% 1% 19
8 RISK OF BIAS Author keyword 13 43% 1% 23
9 METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY Author keyword 12 32% 1% 31
10 THOMAS C CHALMERS SYSTEMAT REVIEWS Address 12 54% 1% 15

Web of Science journal categories

Author Key Words


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class		 LCSH search Wikipedia search
1 CONSORT 35 46% 2% 56 Search CONSORT Search CONSORT
2 REPORTING QUALITY 32 63% 1% 32 Search REPORTING+QUALITY Search REPORTING+QUALITY
3 CONSORT STATEMENT 26 57% 1% 31 Search CONSORT+STATEMENT Search CONSORT+STATEMENT
4 SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 16 15% 4% 99 Search SYSTEMATIC+REVIEWS Search SYSTEMATIC+REVIEWS
5 QUALITY OF REPORTING 14 51% 1% 19 Search QUALITY+OF+REPORTING Search QUALITY+OF+REPORTING
6 RISK OF BIAS 13 43% 1% 23 Search RISK+OF+BIAS Search RISK+OF+BIAS
7 METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY 12 32% 1% 31 Search METHODOLOGICAL+QUALITY Search METHODOLOGICAL+QUALITY
8 EQUATOR NETWORK 11 78% 0% 7 Search EQUATOR+NETWORK Search EQUATOR+NETWORK
9 BLINDING 9 24% 1% 34 Search BLINDING Search BLINDING
10 AMSTAR 9 59% 0% 10 Search AMSTAR Search AMSTAR

Key Words Plus


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 CONSORT STATEMENT 101 25% 14% 347
2 METAANALYSES 42 17% 9% 222
3 SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 37 12% 11% 292
4 METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY 37 24% 5% 131
5 ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT 37 56% 2% 44
6 REVISED CONSORT STATEMENT 31 76% 1% 22
7 CONSOLIDATED STANDARDS 23 79% 1% 15
8 AMSTAR 23 52% 1% 31
9 CARE LITERATURE 18 89% 0% 8
10 JADAD SCALE 17 79% 0% 11

Journals


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS 1 10% 1% 14

Reviews


Title Publ. year Cit. Active
references		 % act. ref.
to same field
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 2009 1973 26 65%
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement 1999 2794 34 65%
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement 2010 540 26 65%
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 2009 1074 26 65%
Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review 2006 277 25 88%
Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses 2013 27 12 92%
A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research 2010 320 15 67%
CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials 2010 268 26 77%
Systematic reviews in health care - Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials 2001 1375 21 81%
Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration 2008 721 93 28%

Address terms


Rank Address term Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 OTTAWA METHODS 32 69% 1.1% 27
2 STAT MED 16 15% 4.0% 101
3 THOMAS C CHALMERS SYSTEMAT REVIEWS 12 54% 0.6% 15
4 COCHRANE ITALIANO 9 59% 0.4% 10
5 CLIN WORKING GRP 8 75% 0.2% 6
6 DEUT COCHRANE ZENTRUM 8 52% 0.4% 11
7 CHALMERS GRP 7 25% 0.9% 24
8 U738 7 19% 1.3% 33
9 NORD COCHRANE 7 21% 1.1% 29
10 PROGRAMA DOCTORADO CIENCIAS MED 6 41% 0.4% 11

Related classes at same level (level 1)


Rank Relatedness score Related classes
1 0.0000226310 PUBLICATION RATE//MEETING ABSTRACTS//PUBLICATION BIAS
2 0.0000188901 EMBASE//MEDLINE//BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASES
3 0.0000157835 ERA EDTA REGISTRY//DENT PUBL HLTH ENDODONT//UNIDAD INVEST EVALUAC
4 0.0000145660 MIXED TREATMENT COMPARISONS//NETWORK META ANALYSIS//RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS
5 0.0000140592 BIOSTATISTICS KNOWLEDGE//AQUACULTURE RESEARCH//BASELINE COMPARISONS
6 0.0000138204 CHIR NET//STUDIENZENTRUM DEUT GESELL CHIRURG//ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY
7 0.0000118353 JOURNAL CLUB//DIAKONIE KLINIKUM JUNG STILLING//EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE EDUCATION
8 0.0000096962 EVIDENCE BASED VETERINARY MEDICINE//ANIM HLTH INFORMAT//EXOT SPECIES SPECIALTY SERV
9 0.0000087796 MEDICAL EPISTEMOLOGY//WORK ENVIRONM MED//CAUSALITY IN MEDICINE
10 0.0000080710 RUN IN PERIOD//THERAPEUTIC INFORMATION//RUN IN