Class information for:
Level 1: CONTINGENT VALUATION//WILLINGNESS TO PAY//CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD

Basic class information
ID Publications Average number
of references		 Avg. shr. active
ref. in WoS
1349 2608 35.8 48%


Bar chart of Publication_year

Last years might be incomplete

Classes in level above (level 2)


ID, lev.
above		 Publications Label for level above
1275 8310 CONTINGENT VALUATION//WILLINGNESS TO PAY//CHOICE EXPERIMENT

Terms with highest relevance score


Rank Term Type of term Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 CONTINGENT VALUATION Author keyword 671 63% 26% 676
2 WILLINGNESS TO PAY Author keyword 221 31% 23% 591
3 CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD Author keyword 104 53% 5% 138
4 HYPOTHETICAL BIAS Author keyword 45 61% 2% 48
5 BENEFIT TRANSFER Author keyword 44 56% 2% 53
6 PROTEST RESPONSES Author keyword 34 93% 0% 13
7 STARTING POINT BIAS Author keyword 32 85% 1% 17
8 SPIKE MODEL Author keyword 29 77% 1% 20
9 DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE Author keyword 28 64% 1% 27
10 PAYMENT VEHICLE Author keyword 23 100% 0% 10

Web of Science journal categories

Author Key Words


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class		 LCSH search Wikipedia search
1 CONTINGENT VALUATION 671 63% 26% 676 Search CONTINGENT+VALUATION Search CONTINGENT+VALUATION
2 WILLINGNESS TO PAY 221 31% 23% 591 Search WILLINGNESS+TO+PAY Search WILLINGNESS+TO+PAY
3 CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD 104 53% 5% 138 Search CONTINGENT+VALUATION+METHOD Search CONTINGENT+VALUATION+METHOD
4 HYPOTHETICAL BIAS 45 61% 2% 48 Search HYPOTHETICAL+BIAS Search HYPOTHETICAL+BIAS
5 BENEFIT TRANSFER 44 56% 2% 53 Search BENEFIT+TRANSFER Search BENEFIT+TRANSFER
6 PROTEST RESPONSES 34 93% 0% 13 Search PROTEST+RESPONSES Search PROTEST+RESPONSES
7 STARTING POINT BIAS 32 85% 1% 17 Search STARTING+POINT+BIAS Search STARTING+POINT+BIAS
8 SPIKE MODEL 29 77% 1% 20 Search SPIKE+MODEL Search SPIKE+MODEL
9 DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE 28 64% 1% 27 Search DICHOTOMOUS+CHOICE Search DICHOTOMOUS+CHOICE
10 PAYMENT VEHICLE 23 100% 0% 10 Search PAYMENT+VEHICLE Search PAYMENT+VEHICLE

Key Words Plus


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 CONTINGENT VALUATION 451 40% 33% 872
2 WILLINGNESS TO PAY 180 25% 24% 633
3 DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE 149 69% 5% 128
4 WELFARE EVALUATIONS 147 83% 3% 83
5 CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS 108 74% 3% 80
6 CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION 106 60% 4% 116
7 HYPOTHETICAL BIAS 92 67% 3% 83
8 STARTING POINT BIAS 87 75% 2% 63
9 PAYMENT CARD 81 96% 1% 25
10 REFERENDUM DATA 76 78% 2% 50

Journals


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS 17 11% 6% 147
2 LAND ECONOMICS 17 10% 6% 152
3 JOURNAL OF FOREST ECONOMICS 3 12% 1% 26

Reviews


Title Publ. year Cit. Active
references		 % act. ref.
to same field
Willingly or grudgingly? A meta-analysis on the willingness-to-pay for renewable energy use 2015 2 88 70%
The public's value for developing ocean energy technology in the Republic of Korea: A contingent valuation study 2015 1 17 88%
Italian households' willingness to pay for green electricity 2014 6 39 87%
Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence 2001 320 66 80%
The contingent valuation method: a review 2004 169 68 79%
Assessment of public acceptance and willingness to pay for renewable energy sources in Crete 2010 48 21 67%
A social marketing mix for renewable energy in Europe based on consumer stated preference surveys 2012 17 28 54%
Theory versus practice: A review of 'willingness-to-pay' in health and health care 2001 149 16 63%
Willingness to pay for renewable energy: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey in Kenya 2011 14 18 61%
Assessment of Korean customers' willingness to pay with RPS 2012 10 24 67%

Address terms


Rank Address term Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 PEDM 6 80% 0.2% 4
2 CSERGE 6 19% 1.1% 28
3 ANAL SAFETY POLICY ATTITUDES RISK 3 100% 0.1% 3
4 CONNECTICUT SEA GRANT OFF 3 100% 0.1% 3
5 FO T ECON 3 11% 1.0% 26
6 SOCIAL ECON GLOBAL ENVIRONM 3 15% 0.7% 19
7 UNIDAD ECON 3 60% 0.1% 3
8 FO T CIFOR 3 29% 0.3% 8
9 ENVIRONM PRAISAL MANAGEMENT 2 36% 0.2% 5
10 GABINETE DESENVOLVIMENTO REG SUSTENTAVEL 2 67% 0.1% 2

Related classes at same level (level 1)


Rank Relatedness score Related classes
1 0.0000245968 TRAVEL COST METHOD//RECREATION DEMAND//TRAVEL COST MODEL
2 0.0000214379 DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT//CHOICE EXPERIMENTS//DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS
3 0.0000179463 VALUE OF STATISTICAL LIFE//VALUE OF A STATISTICAL LIFE//VALUE PER STATISTICAL LIFE
4 0.0000162059 ENDOWMENT EFFECT//WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT//WTA WTP DISPARITY
5 0.0000114604 PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS//JOHN HICKS//LOCAL COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
6 0.0000098115 ECOSYSTEM SERVICES//SOCIAL ECOL SYST//ECOSYSTEM SERVICE VALUE
7 0.0000078658 MUSIASEM//ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS//SOCIETAL METABOLISM
8 0.0000076195 ORGANIC FOODS//EXPERIMENTAL AUCTIONS//ORGANIC FOOD
9 0.0000048959 COMPROMISE SET//IMPROVEMENT OF PRODUCTIVITY//INTERFACE ARCHITECTURES
10 0.0000048500 GOVERNMENT GROWTH//GOVERNMENT SUPPORT PROGRAMS//PURE PUBLIC GOOD