Class information for:
Level 1: PRESCRIPTION STIMULANTS//NONMEDICAL USE//MORAL ENHANCEMENT

Basic class information
ID Publications Average number
of references		 Avg. shr. active
ref. in WoS
13203 789 39.8 57%


Bar chart of Publication_year

Last years might be incomplete

Classes in level above (level 2)


ID, lev.
above		 Publications Label for level above
2286 4159 NONMEDICAL USE//PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE//PRESCRIPTION OPIOIDS

Terms with highest relevance score


Rank Term Type of term Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 PRESCRIPTION STIMULANTS Author keyword 55 82% 4% 32
2 NONMEDICAL USE Author keyword 42 71% 4% 34
3 MORAL ENHANCEMENT Author keyword 41 87% 3% 20
4 NONMEDICAL PRESCRIPTION DRUG USE Author keyword 35 89% 2% 16
5 PRESCRIPTION DRUG MISUSE Author keyword 29 54% 5% 37
6 COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT Author keyword 22 32% 7% 58
7 NEUROENHANCEMENT Author keyword 15 46% 3% 24
8 NON MEDICAL USE OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS Author keyword 12 86% 1% 6
9 MORAL BIOENHANCEMENT Author keyword 11 100% 1% 6
10 WOMEN GENDER Address 9 20% 5% 42

Web of Science journal categories

Author Key Words


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class		 LCSH search Wikipedia search
1 PRESCRIPTION STIMULANTS 55 82% 4% 32 Search PRESCRIPTION+STIMULANTS Search PRESCRIPTION+STIMULANTS
2 NONMEDICAL USE 42 71% 4% 34 Search NONMEDICAL+USE Search NONMEDICAL+USE
3 MORAL ENHANCEMENT 41 87% 3% 20 Search MORAL+ENHANCEMENT Search MORAL+ENHANCEMENT
4 NONMEDICAL PRESCRIPTION DRUG USE 35 89% 2% 16 Search NONMEDICAL+PRESCRIPTION+DRUG+USE Search NONMEDICAL+PRESCRIPTION+DRUG+USE
5 PRESCRIPTION DRUG MISUSE 29 54% 5% 37 Search PRESCRIPTION+DRUG+MISUSE Search PRESCRIPTION+DRUG+MISUSE
6 COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT 22 32% 7% 58 Search COGNITIVE+ENHANCEMENT Search COGNITIVE+ENHANCEMENT
7 NEUROENHANCEMENT 15 46% 3% 24 Search NEUROENHANCEMENT Search NEUROENHANCEMENT
8 NON MEDICAL USE OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS 12 86% 1% 6 Search NON+MEDICAL+USE+OF+PRESCRIPTION+DRUGS Search NON+MEDICAL+USE+OF+PRESCRIPTION+DRUGS
9 MORAL BIOENHANCEMENT 11 100% 1% 6 Search MORAL+BIOENHANCEMENT Search MORAL+BIOENHANCEMENT
10 NON MEDICAL PRESCRIPTION DRUG USE 8 75% 1% 6 Search NON+MEDICAL+PRESCRIPTION+DRUG+USE Search NON+MEDICAL+PRESCRIPTION+DRUG+USE

Key Words Plus


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 ILLICIT USE 246 78% 21% 164
2 NONMEDICAL USE 84 40% 21% 163
3 PRESCRIPTION STIMULANTS 56 50% 10% 81
4 UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT SAMPLE 19 76% 2% 13
5 COSMETIC NEUROLOGY 15 56% 2% 18
6 PAIN MEDICATION 15 73% 1% 11
7 CONTROLLED MEDICATIONS 14 100% 1% 7
8 NONMEDICAL STIMULANT USE 12 86% 1% 6
9 NEUROENHANCEMENT 10 73% 1% 8
10 ENHANCING DRUGS 9 50% 2% 13

Journals


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 NEUROETHICS 5 15% 4% 30

Reviews


Title Publ. year Cit. Active
references		 % act. ref.
to same field
A Systematic Review of Risk and Protective Factors Associated With Nonmedical Use of Prescription Drugs Among Youth in the United States: A Social Ecological Perspective 2015 2 52 79%
Nonmedical Use of Prescription Medications Among Adolescents in the United States: A Systematic Review 2012 31 41 71%
Misuse and diversion of stimulants prescribed for ADHD: A systematic review of the literature 2008 209 42 40%
What should we do about student use of cognitive enhancers? An analysis of current evidence 2013 22 31 48%
Should physicians prescribe cognitive enhancers to healthy individuals? 2013 4 19 95%
Pediatric neuroenhancement Ethical, legal, social, and neurodevelopmental implications 2013 15 24 38%
Modafinil and methylphenidate for neuroenhancement in healthy individuals: A systematic review 2010 88 51 24%
Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do? 2004 185 14 43%
Use of methylphenidate among medical students: a systematic review 2013 2 5 100%
Prescription Medication Sharing: A Systematic Review of the Literature 2014 1 27 70%

Address terms


Rank Address term Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 WOMEN GENDER 9 20% 5.3% 42
2 ABORAT 882 4 75% 0.4% 3
3 OFF AE 340 2 67% 0.3% 2
4 SOCIAL SCI MEDIA SPORTS 2 67% 0.3% 2
5 NEUROETH UNIT 2 18% 1.3% 10
6 ALCOHOL DRUG ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAM 2 13% 1.4% 11
7 MED ETH PHILOSOPHY MED 1 19% 0.8% 6
8 ADM RECORDS PLICAT 1 33% 0.4% 3
9 INSERM 1061 1 40% 0.3% 2
10 CYAHD 1 33% 0.3% 2

Related classes at same level (level 1)


Rank Relatedness score Related classes
1 0.0000177023 CHRONIC NONCANCER PAIN//OPIOIDS//PRESCRIPTION MONITORING PROGRAMS
2 0.0000135271 MODAFINIL//ARMODAFINIL//INTEGRIS SLEEP DISORDERS OKLAHOMA
3 0.0000131643 RITALIN//METHYLPHENIDATE//METHYLPHENIDATE RITALIN
4 0.0000112981 CEIP MARSEILLE//CEIP//EVALUAT INFORMAT PHARMACODEPENDANCE ADDICTO
5 0.0000095909 NEUROETHICS//CEREBRAL SUBJECT//ORGANIZATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE
6 0.0000081687 HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE CLONING//GERM LINE THERAPY//HUMAN GENETIC ENGINEERING
7 0.0000080012 NON IDENTITY PROBLEM//POPULATION ETHICS//MERE ADDITION PARADOX
8 0.0000067475 ATTENTION DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER//METHYLPHENIDATE//ADHD
9 0.0000062858 ADULT ADHD//ADHD//JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS
10 0.0000054497 SELF MEDICATION//MEDICINE USE//FKL