Class information for:
Level 1: RESERVE SELECTION//CONSERVATION PLANNING//SYSTEMATIC CONSERVATION PLANNING

Basic class information

ID Publications Average number
of references
Avg. shr. active
ref. in WoS
1203 2693 49.0 55%



Bar chart of Publication_year

Last years might be incomplete

Classes in level above (level 2)



ID, lev.
above
Publications Label for level above
1903 5359 RESERVE SELECTION//CONSERVATION PLANNING//SYSTEMATIC CONSERVATION PLANNING

Terms with highest relevance score



Rank Term Type of term Relevance score
(tfidf)
Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences
Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term
Num. of
publ. in
class
1 RESERVE SELECTION Author keyword 192 78% 5% 126
2 CONSERVATION PLANNING Author keyword 122 35% 10% 282
3 SYSTEMATIC CONSERVATION PLANNING Author keyword 111 63% 4% 112
4 RESERVE DESIGN Author keyword 46 44% 3% 78
5 IRREPLACEABILITY Author keyword 45 68% 1% 40
6 MARXAN Author keyword 39 51% 2% 55
7 PROTECTED AREAS Author keyword 38 16% 8% 220
8 SITE SELECTION ALGORITHM Author keyword 37 100% 1% 14
9 RESERVE SITE SELECTION Author keyword 34 79% 1% 22
10 GAP ANALYSIS Author keyword 33 31% 3% 90

Web of Science journal categories

Author Key Words



Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)
Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences
Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term
Num. of
publ. in
class
LCSH search Wikipedia search
1 RESERVE SELECTION 192 78% 5% 126 Search RESERVE+SELECTION Search RESERVE+SELECTION
2 CONSERVATION PLANNING 122 35% 10% 282 Search CONSERVATION+PLANNING Search CONSERVATION+PLANNING
3 SYSTEMATIC CONSERVATION PLANNING 111 63% 4% 112 Search SYSTEMATIC+CONSERVATION+PLANNING Search SYSTEMATIC+CONSERVATION+PLANNING
4 RESERVE DESIGN 46 44% 3% 78 Search RESERVE+DESIGN Search RESERVE+DESIGN
5 IRREPLACEABILITY 45 68% 1% 40 Search IRREPLACEABILITY Search IRREPLACEABILITY
6 MARXAN 39 51% 2% 55 Search MARXAN Search MARXAN
7 PROTECTED AREAS 38 16% 8% 220 Search PROTECTED+AREAS Search PROTECTED+AREAS
8 SITE SELECTION ALGORITHM 37 100% 1% 14 Search SITE+SELECTION+ALGORITHM Search SITE+SELECTION+ALGORITHM
9 RESERVE SITE SELECTION 34 79% 1% 22 Search RESERVE+SITE+SELECTION Search RESERVE+SITE+SELECTION
10 GAP ANALYSIS 33 31% 3% 90 Search GAP+ANALYSIS Search GAP+ANALYSIS

Key Words Plus



Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)
Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences
Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term
Num. of
publ. in
class
1 RESERVE SELECTION 270 66% 9% 248
2 RESERVE SELECTION ALGORITHMS 140 86% 3% 70
3 MAXIMIZE BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY 106 91% 2% 43
4 IRREPLACEABILITY 95 78% 2% 63
5 GAP ANALYSIS 70 54% 3% 91
6 CAPE FLORISTIC REGION 65 39% 5% 133
7 EFFICIENT CONSERVATION 48 91% 1% 20
8 INDICATOR GROUPS 45 60% 2% 49
9 PLACE PRIORITIZATION 41 90% 1% 18
10 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION 40 14% 10% 273

Journals



Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)
Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences
Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term
Num. of
publ. in
class
1 CONSERVATION LETTERS 10 16% 2% 54
2 NATURE CONSERVATION-BULGARIA 1 13% 0% 7

Reviews



Title Publ. year Cit. Active references % act. ref.
to same field
Global biodiversity conservation priorities 2006 531 38 79%
Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: The effectiveness of surrogates 2007 153 71 93%
Conservation planning in a changing world 2007 302 62 48%
Integrating economic costs into conservation planning 2006 311 59 68%
Conservation on private land: a review of global strategies with a proposed classification system 2015 3 34 32%
The performance and potential of protected areas 2014 20 65 38%
Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning 2013 15 163 85%
Systematic conservation planning 2000 1821 54 52%
Freshwater conservation planning: the case for systematic approaches 2011 49 76 58%
Scale Mismatches, Conservation Planning, and the Value of Social-Network Analyses 2013 17 57 65%

Address terms



Rank Address term Relevance score
(tfidf)
Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences
Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term
Num. of
publ. in
class
1 BIO ERS BIOCULTURAL CONSERVAT 27 72% 0.8% 21
2 GLOBAL MAMMAL ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME 15 88% 0.3% 7
3 SO AFRICAN HOTSPOTS PROGRAM CONSERVAT INT 14 100% 0.3% 7
4 GLOBAL MAMMAL ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 12 58% 0.5% 14
5 BIOGEOG CONSERVAT 11 40% 0.8% 21
6 BIO ERS MACROECOL GRP 11 20% 1.7% 47
7 TROP RIVERS COASTAL KNOWLEDGE 8 70% 0.3% 7
8 ENVIRONM PROGRAM NORTHERN AUSTRALIA HUB 8 60% 0.3% 9
9 PL BIO ERS SCI 8 22% 1.2% 33
10 CONSERVAT BIOL GRP 7 21% 1.1% 29

Related classes at same level (level 1)



Rank Relatedness score Related classes
1 0.0000148636 KIRTLANDS WARBLER//ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT//HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANS
2 0.0000114047 EXPERIMENTAL MANAGEMENT//ACTIVE ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT//AUSTRALIAN EXCELLENCE RISK ANAL
3 0.0000111663 PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY//COMMUNITY PHYLOGENETICS//QUADRATIC ENTROPY
4 0.0000106696 RESEARCH IMPLEMENTATION GAP//EVIDENCE BASED CONSERVATION//EVIDENCE BASED CONSERVAT
5 0.0000090400 MAXENT//SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS//SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODEL
6 0.0000085579 SIGHTING RECORD//IVORY BILLED WOODPECKER//GUMBEL DOMAIN OF ATTRACTION
7 0.0000083269 MID DOMAIN EFFECT//RAPOPORTS RULE//DIVERSITY GRADIENTS
8 0.0000080279 SPECTRAL VARIATION HYPOTHESIS//DYNAMIC HABITAT INDEX//BIOLOGICAL RICHNESS
9 0.0000079220 CROP RAIDING//HUMAN ELEPHANT CONFLICT//ETHNOPRIMATOLOGY
10 0.0000072772 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT//ENVIRONMENTAL STRATIFICATION//NETHERLANDS RIVER STUDIES