The course is organized in 3 different seminars as well as preparations in the form of reading and homework.
The course focuses on:
introduction to the publication and review process, review practices and how to review articles, ethics and practical exercises to review articles.Each student receives clear feedback on the review tasks included.
FMF3036 Reviewing Scientific Articles 3.0 credits
Reviewing scientific articles is one of the most important activities for all scholars. You support your peers in developing better publications and, through that, help your scientific community make progress. You help yourself become a better author, by reviewing others’ papers and receiving reviews of your own work. Reviewing is something that must and can be learned. This course help young academics make the first step in their reviewing career and focus on the process, good reviewer practice and hands on practice.
Information per course offering
Choose semester and course offering to see current information and more about the course, such as course syllabus, study period, and application information.
Information for Spring 2025 Start 14 Jan 2025 programme students
- Course location
KTH Campus
- Duration
- 14 Jan 2025 - 12 Jan 2026
- Periods
Spring 2025: P3 (1.0 hp)
Autumn 2025: P1 (1.0 hp), P2 (1.0 hp)
- Pace of study
10%
- Application code
60900
- Form of study
Normal Daytime
- Language of instruction
English
- Course memo
- Course memo is not published
- Number of places
1 - 16
- Target group
Admitted to PhD studies
- Planned modular schedule
- [object Object]
- Schedule
- Schedule is not published
- Part of programme
- No information inserted
Contact
Jennie Björk (jenniebj@kth.se)
Course syllabus as PDF
Please note: all information from the Course syllabus is available on this page in an accessible format.
Course syllabus FMF3036 (Spring 2021–)Information for research students about course offerings
For registration please contact Jennie Björk (jenniebj@kth.se)
Content and learning outcomes
Course contents
Intended learning outcomes
After finished the course the students should be able to:
- Be aware of good reviewing practices and ethics
- Know how to analyze and evaluate scientific papers
- Be able to skillfully develop reviews of scientific papers, and to justify and motivate reviewer recommendations to editor(s) and author(s)
Literature and preparations
Specific prerequisites
The course is primarily open to young scholars (PhD students, postdocs, early career assistant professors), working in the fields of creativity, innovation management and related areas.
Equipment
Literature
Examination and completion
If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.
Grading scale
Examination
- DEL1 - Participation in 3 seminars, 1.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
- UPP1 - Written reports: review, 2.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.
The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.
Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination
Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination
Examiner
Ethical approach
- All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
- In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
- In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.